| DISASTER
RECOVERY
JOURNAL
P. O. Box 510110
St. Louis, MO 63151
(314) 894-0276
Fax: (314) 894-7474
Internet
www.drj.com
E-mail drj@drj.com
PUBLISHER
Richard L. Arnold, CBCP
richard@drj.com
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
Jon Seals
jon@drj.com
SENIOR EDITOR
Janette Ballman
janette@drj.com
COPY EDITORS
Richard Sandhofer
richards@drj.com
Pamela Clifton
pamelaclifton@hotmail.com
ADVERTISING
Robert Arnold
bob@drj.com
_____________
Corporate
President/CEO
Richard L. Arnold, CBCP
richard@drj.com
Vice
President
Robert Arnold
bob@drj.com
CONFERENCE COORDINATOR
Patti Fitzgerald, CBCP
patti@drj.com
CONFERENCE REGISTRAR
Merce Knese
mercedes@drj.com
CIRCULATION
Laura Baugh
laurab@drj.com
EXECUTIVE
COUNCIL
Jeff Dato, MBCP, KPMG
John Jackson, J Albright Advisors
Edward Devlin, E.S. Devlin & Associates
James Hammill, CBCP, JMH Consulting
Pat McAnally, SunGard Availability
Brian Turley, Strohl Systems
Belinda Wilson, Hewlett-Packard
INTERNATIONAL
CONTACTS
England: Thom Hetherington
Business Continuity
Phone: 0161-237-1007
thomh@tempus.demon.co.uk
Australia: Anthony J. Harvey
Journal of Business Continuity
Phone: 0011-613-953-0055-8
fax: 0011-613-953-0528
sector@notability.com.au
Japan: Shinji Hosotsubo
Quake Japan Co., Ltd.
Phone: 03-3215-2880
fax: 03-3215-2881
|
|
Click
Here for a Printable Version
To Outsource or Not Outsource
By CHRIS HYRNE
Whether using a service provider or going in-house, disaster recovery
comes down to flexible, well managed practices
Tape vaulting services from business continuity service providers (BCPs)
have traditionally provided the last line of defense for many companies’ disaster
recovery plans, particularly for mid-sized enterprises. However, growing
requirements to recover operations more quickly than with traditional
service offerings caused companies to look hard at internal alternatives.
Now, BCPs have seen recent resurgence due to the emergence of long
distance replication software as a viable solution for offsite data
protection and recovery. BCPs are now able to offer a range of warm
and hot site recovery options with near real-time recovery time/recovery
point service levels and minimal disruption to their clients’ IT
operations.
As the menu of options grows for companies pressed to improve business
recoverability, the decision to outsource or to go in-house becomes
less clear. Mobile computing has reduced clients’ dependency
on BCP-provided office space, a significant bottleneck for BCPs offering
regional disaster recovery services. Test time offerings have improved
as well. The “standard” one week of test time per year
goes quite a bit farther when recovery times are measured in minutes
instead of hours or days. But when service level metrics dictate quick
recovery, the overriding factor is proficiency. The ability to aggregate
skills and maintain compliant recovery practices may be the biggest
factor weighing in the BCP’s favor. The BCP’s only business
is recovery: every hour of every day. The typical internal IT department
may “practice” recovery two to four times a year at best.
For those looking to pursue an in-house strategy it makes sense to
take some of your leads from the BCP model:
- Review your remote recovery. A successful recovery
plan should incorporate an offsite capability for data and application
recovery, and that the center should be substantially removed from
your production sites. This sounds basic, but most firms today still
only have sufficient practices in place for local recovery and offsite
tape storage. Accordingly, implement a three-tier geographic plan
for where, when and why data protection and recovery will take place:
local protection and recovery at your production site(s) to maintain
operations in the event of data loss, establish an offsite disaster
recovery capability for site or infrastructure loss, as well as an
archive (the bunker) for certification of records retention.
- Consolidate
protection and recovery operations where you can. Putting your eggs
in one basket may sound counter-intuitive but it does make sense.
The biggest challenge to compliant recovery is solidifying your operational
practices. Consider creating a center or centers of competency and
move your data to sites where you can achieve better control through
centralized management, leverage key skills, and gain economies of
scale.
- Build a hardware-independent framework. One CIO
told me he thinks of data protection and recovery as a business application,
not infrastructure. “We
used to buy data protection for the hardware. It should be the other
way around. No one ties their business applications to specific hardware
platforms,” he said. This approach will drive greater flexibility
in meeting evolving service level requirements and allow deployment
of more cost-effective infrastructures.
- Automate with care. These
days there is a lot of “buzz” from
the vendor community about automated recovery. Automation can be
a very good thing and works well when things go as planned, but
it is not a replacement for human judgment from skilled administrators
when things go “bump” in the night. Think about automating
discrete process steps first, before tackling end-to-end processes.
The sequence of recovery steps may vary, depending on the events
leading up to and following a partial, rolling or complete loss of
processing at the production site.
- Know your RPO. Today, emphasis
is still placed on recovery times (RTO). But the currency of your
recovered data (RPO) is equally as important. For both, define service
levels for not only your financials and transactional data but also
data essential to the business such as e-mail, supply chain data,
CRM and lead generation databases. And be prescriptive; build a
basic menu of service levels that you offer, and know you can deliver
with confidence.
When choosing between outsourcing
to upgrade your disaster recovery capabilities, or building out your
own infrastructure, the primary consideration is skills. In either
case, a flexible service delivery framework, based on a utility model,
can provide the foundation for success.
Chris Hyrne is vice president of marketing at Topio, a global provider
of software for data replication and recovery across the spectrum of
locations, platforms, and storage that support the enterprise. Topio
is based in Santa Clara, Calif
©Copyright
Systems Support Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole
or in part in any form or medium without the express written permission
of System Support Inc. is prohibited.
|