
How To Avoid A Second Disaster- In Communications
By Carol A. Keslar
How will your customers react if your business suffers a disaster? What will your employees do? If the
event is newsworthy, how will the headlines read? Answering those questions before a disaster occurs
may prevent a second disaster for your business a communications crisis.
Experience tells us that if management doesnt take control of the information process during a crisis,
its at the mercy of outside interests, rumor and speculation. Either the company or someone out of its
control is going to take the microphone to tell the story of what happened and what is being done
about it.
In the long run, a companys most lasting image often is formed by the way it handles bad news.
Months after Hurricane Andrew, stories still are being written about companies that acted quickly to
recover business operations and get help to their customers, employees and communities and were
prepared to state what actions they were taking.
Because doing business today requires immediate access to vast amounts of information, planning for
information system (I/S) disasters is a crucial part of advance preparations. More than ever, businesses
can not operate without their data capabilities. Globalization, company consolidations, the focus on
core competencies all have increased company dependence on I/S.
Whatever their origin, disasters involve some degree of surprise. Even when plotting a hurricane, serious
questions remain unanswered until the winds make landfall. Most disasters are complete surprises. A
sudden electrical outage. A flood. A failure in the system. An accident. The most precarious
communications response is the one that improvises on the spot instead of deciding in advance who
needs to know what, when and where.
Indelible images linger years after the crises that affected Johnson & Johnson, Perrier, Exxon, NASA
and Union Carbide. In some cases, the memory is of fast, decisive action effectively communicated. In
others, the memory is tainted by delayed action or a failure to communicate, with the resulting image of
being disorganized or not under control.
The first rule in crisis communications is to take the initiative; determine the facts and be the first to
inform those who need to know. Its good business as well as sound communications.
While its a truism to say that no two disasters are the same, there are common elements which come
into play in all disasters. For starters, the media will be on the companys doorstep, wanting briefings,
interviews and updates on what happened all dictated not by your readiness to respond, but by their
deadlines.
Just as quickly as the media, your customers need to make decisions on whether, where and how they
will continue to do business with you. Employees want to know what theyre supposed to do, when
and where. Meanwhile, shareholders and financial analysts are forming a lasting impression based on
how they perceive you as handling the situation.
From office cubicles to local TV screens, communications will occur whether or not your company
takes the initiative in communicating. Failure to take the initiative in that unavoidable communications
process poses serious risks. Employee morale can be seriously damaged and an atmosphere of
disorganization and chaos created. Management credibility can be undermined, along with good will
among customers, suppliers and vendors and confidence among stockholders.
A business that is perceived as ill-prepared or disorganized after a disaster can lose market share as well
as new business opportunities. Given the increased emphasis on accountability among stockholders as
well as government agencies, there is an added risk of legal exposure if management is seen as
ineffective and failing in its responsibilities.
Just as the painful lesson has been learned that the time to begin dealing with disasters is on the drawing
board in advance not when they take a company by surprise the same lesson is being learned with
regard to communications. To be effective, plans must be developed and tested in advance both for
business recovery and for communications during and after a disaster.
Hurricane Andrew was a disaster filled with reminders about the role of communications. Employees
needed to know where to get help, food, temporary housing and cash and then where and when to
report to work. From bank customers who wanted to withdraw cash to families who needed milk for
infants and from reporters clamoring for news to public agencies wanting to be updated, there was a
nonstop demand for information.
With 1700 miles of power lines down, Florida Power & Light issued media advisories with safety tips
for the public and held daily news conferences about the recovery process. IBM and other South
Florida employers issued news wire releases asking employees to call their company 800 number to
confirm that they were okay and to get the help needed for themselves and their families.
IBMs communications support involved writing news releases, making available backgrounders, fact
sheets and video, answering media questions and conducting interviews. It also included working with
public agencies in the affected areas and gathering information about IBMs relief efforts.
When a crisis occurs, its in a companys best interests to be candid and cooperative and to be seen as
taking strong, positive action to handle the situation and return to normal operations. The more serious
the problem the more important it is to gather, verify and manage the flow of information to critical
audiences.
At such times, its tempting to think only in terms of Meet the Press, since the media immediately
come knocking at the door and soon are broadcasting and printing information right or wrong on
what happened. But what about also responding to the other crucial audiences that can make the
difference between recovering or suffering consequences that endanger the future of the company?
These audiences need to be targeted: employees and their families, customers, suppliers, contractors,
consultants, shareholders, financial analysts and community groups, as well as public and government
agencies. In addition, there is the panoply of media contacts in the business, financial and trade press
newspapers, magazines, radio and TV. The list of audiences is formidable.
Even a company thats prepared learns from hindsight about the importance of communications. At
John Alden Life Insurance, headquartered in Miami, a disaster recovery plan kept the company up and
running after Hurricane Andrew, but still there were communications lessons to learn. Carlos Miro, vice
president for technology services, reported that the company needed better management of
communications within the company so that everyone knew who was doing what and what each
persons responsibilities were.
Finally, he added, we realized that we should have communicated more effectively with other parts
of our organization. We are a national company, and some offices in other parts of the country thought
it was business as usual in our office.
As with business recovery, communications in a disaster has two parts:
1. Advance planning and preparation
2. Effective implementation of a plan
To be effective, communications strategy must take into account overall business strategies and
priorities and company policies, practices and procedures. This cant be done in the middle of a crisis.
Advance planning develops answers to these questions:
Who are the key individuals in the com- pany to contact?
How can they be contacted?
Whos in charge of the information sys- tem?
Which technical experts can provide brief- ings?
Who are the key audiences?
What do they want and need to know?
Who are the spokespersons?
Are they trained and prepared?
What are the key messages?
Who needs to be contacted outside the company, including the key media?
This daunting array of questions leaves no doubt that advance planning is essential in order to
communicate effectively during a disaster. Such planning demands formation of a crisis
communications team thats prepared and ready to spring into action.
A spokesperson (and his/her backup) is an integral part of a team that also includes technical experts (to
guarantee accurate information) and a communications coordinator. The coordinator would be
responsible for drawing up a response plan, keeping it up-to-date and directing its implementation in
case of a disaster.
But the team cant exist only on paper. Dress rehearsals are needed to test the degree of preparedness
and to identify and correct any weaknesses in the communications plan.
Communications equipment must be available and in working order, with alternative locations as a
backup. Part of preparedness is planning for worst case situations and facing What If questions, such
as: What if the phone lines are down? What if the standby facilities to print materials are out of
commission? What if the crisis communications team cant reach the scene of the disaster?
Since company spokespersons play a crucial role during an emergency, they must be carefully selected,
prepared and briefed on the communications plan. Spokespersons, with backups, must be ready to
field tough questions and able to explain technical information. They must follow the operating principle
of honesty and accuracy and they cannot be the individuals assigned to manage the crisis.
Look for spokespersons with these traits:
Experienced in dealing with the media
Knowledgeable about the company and its operations
Familiar with top management and its mindset
Comfortable and effective in speaking to the public
Able to think on their feet
The spokesperson or someone else must be assigned the role of communicating with employees,
customers, shareholders and any other key audiences. Whatever information is provided must be
centrally approved and coordinated through the crisis communications team so it is accurate, consistent
and relevant.
Advance planning and a checklist ensure that key audiences are contacted in a timely fashion. One pitfall
is to delay or fail to contact the appropriate local, state and federal organizations and authorities. These
could include police and fire departments, mayors office, utilities, hospitals, EPA, FAA, etc.
Dress rehearsals and periodic reviews of communications plans ensure against another pitfall: failure to
keep plans and their key details up-to-date and in tune with changes in personnel, facilities and
operations. A crisis is the worst time to discover that you have an outdated phone number or that a key
internal contact is no longer with the company.
With advance planning, standby materials are available in order to communicate effectively and in a
timely fashion.
They include current background material on the company and on its information system, prepared
statements (ready for appropriate modifications), contingency Q & As, photographs of the facility for
the media, audio and video tapes, lists of contacts in the media and in key constituencies.
A communications crisis team must be ready to prepare, orchestrate and disseminate the flow of
messages that are part of the information requirements in a disaster. These center on employee alerts,
evacuation announcements and procedures, site closin
Prompt dissemination of information is vital on many fronts, from the need for employees to assist in
the response to the need for customers to maintain your credibility in doing business. Where a crisis
becomes serious and its ramifications widespread in the community, arrangements must be made for
media briefings. These often include authorities from local, state and federal government as well as fire
and police.
In an ongoing crisis, a communications team needs to:
Make spokespersons available to up date the media regularly
Correct diplomatically mistakes made by the media
Continue to log all calls from the media and key audiences and ensure that inquir- ies are answered
Provide technical experts as needed for in-depth briefings
Arrange for senior management to make follow-up comments
Evaluate information and statements so they reflect the latest developments.
Announcing the end of a crisis is not enough. Follow-up is crucial to make certain all the crucial
audiences know what they need to know. Press releases, statements, briefings are part of the process.
So is attention to communications in order to strengthen a companys credibility with employees,
customers and any other audiences important to the business.
In summary, a communications crisis team faces a formidable task and a company may need to turn to
a consultant for outside help. To start with, its public relations department can be first-rate and still lack
crisis communications experience or I/S knowledge.
A communications consultant should supplement the expertise of your PR department with crisis
communications experience, the ability to translate technical information for non-technical audiences and
knowledge of the I/S media.
The consultant also can provide media training for spokespersons and work with you to create and test
an effective crisis communications preparedness plan.
During a crisis, a consultant should provide an objective view of the communications task and keep the
response focussed on pressure points and key audiences. Typically, an outside expert is best suited to
balance differing points of view, besides coming armed with knowledge and experience in such
situations. This is particularly the case where I/S disasters are concerned.
In action, a communications response to a crisis succeeds when a sound plan is effectively
implemented.
The communications team works in terms of its objectives. It manages the issues by sticking to clearly
defined themes. Sights are set on crucial audiences.
What must come across is the overriding message: We have met the crisis, are dealing with it and
normalizing operations.
In fact, something happens to the media and analysts during a disaster. Not only do they rush to print
the bad news, they also look for good news on how everyone, including your company, is
responding to the crisis.
Theyre ready to hand you the microphone so you can tell your story if youre prepared and ready
to do so.
Carol A. Keslar is marketing media advisor, IBM Communications Services.
This article adapted from Vol. 6 #2.
DR World Main Index | Return to DRJ's Homepage
Disaster Recovery Worldİ 1999, and Disaster Recovery Journalİ
1999, are copyrighted by Systems Support, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction
in whole or part is prohibited without the express written permission form
Systems Support, Inc.