We might argue with any number of Nietzsche's philosophical tenants, but this statement seems to define not only the human condition but also the quality of resilience that we aspire to in the plans and programs we build around business continuity and disaster recovery.
Americans are not the only people tested sorely in the past several years by hurricanes, tornadoes, tropical storms, wildfires, floods, extreme heat or earthquakes. Nor have we had to bear the triple scenario that included a magnitude 9 earthquake, a tsunami, and the failure of major nuclear power plants in Japan in 2011. Debris from those events is still washing up on the coast of the State of Washington, where I live. That series of events in Japan should lead all of us in business continuity and emergency management to reconsider the fundamental assumptions on which we make our plans, and ask "What really is the worst case, now that conditions on the Earth have changed so significantly from climate change?" For there's no doubt that things have changed, even though our plans have probably not been dusted off more than once a year for a drill or exercise, rather than an actual fail-over for the technology components.