Industry Hot News (6426)
It hasn’t even been a week since Nepal’s massive earthquake killed thousands and destroyed businesses, homes, roads and hospitals across the country. But already, the United Nations has called for $415 million in aid; more than $50 million has been pledged by 53 countries and foundations for immediate relief. Private donors, foundation and businesses will likely promise millions more.
Outsiders were similarly generous after the earthquake in Haiti, the Indonesian tsunami and Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy. This money is important — it enables emergency response teams like the ones I’ve been on to restore essential services and provide water, shelter and food.
But are these teams spending this money effectively? Are we doing the best we can to reach the most people as quickly as possible? Nobody knows.
Business users are finding that the self-serve data and integration tools they craved are leading to more confusion and frustration, it seems.
“Last year the buzzwords were data discovery and governed data discovery—everyone wanted to learn as much as possible about those two concepts,” writes Rado Kotorov, vice president of Product Marketing for Information Builders. “Based on the excitement last year, it seemed that data discovery would replace all other styles of BI and analytics. But I found that the excitement over data discovery was replaced at this year’s Gartner summits by confusion and concerns.”
Since Gartner is all about bimodal IT this year — or what the rest of us have called self-service technology — the research firm’s answer to this is “bimodal BI.” The approach basically calls for separating data discovery and analytics from traditional BI reporting.
How should your clients back up their data? It may seem like a simple question, but the answer many MSPs provide--“a dedicated backup service, of course!”--may or may not be the right solution for every client. In reality, both business-grade file sync and traditional backup services have overlapping functionality when it comes protecting data against permanent loss. Ask your clients the following five questions to determine whether file sync or a dedicated backup solution is a better fit for their needs:
A study by research firm IDC carried out on behalf of Carbonite has revealed that over 80% of small to medium sized businesses (SMBs) have experienced downtime in the past, and that the costs associated with this downtime conservatively range from $82,200 to $256,000 for a single event.
Small businesses are by no means exempt from disruption and the latest Horizon Scan report carried out by the Business Continuity Institute shows that business continuity professionals working for smaller organizations have concerns about the same threats that their counterparts in larger organizations have. What is potentially a greater danger for these SMBs however, is that they often have less capacity to absorb any disruption.
The survey does show that for many SMBs, the threats they face are not going unchallenged. The survey of 700 SMBs worldwide found that 81% of those currently using business continuity solutions are considering improvements to their strategies, while 72% plan to increase investments in business continuity over the next 12 to 24 months.
“Small businesses are facing operational challenges stemming from persistent data growth, budgetary constraints and the need to produce more with less which is driving adoption of cloud computing, data analytics and mobility similar to their enterprise counterparts,” said Laura DuBois, Vice President of IDC’s storage practice. “To address these challenges, SMBs have signalled a need and intention to drive material spending on business continuity in the next 12 to 24 months.”
The main driver behind increased investment in business continuity is the threat of downtime which 76% of SMBs surveyed cited as the single biggest reason for purchasing business continuity solutions. The reason for this is clear as the study highlights that the average estimated cost for an hour of downtime for an SMB ranges from $8,220 to $25,600, and typically an unplanned event can last for as long as 24 hours – which could be devastating to a small business.
“When it comes to disaster recovery, the stakes are higher for small businesses,” said Mohamed Ali, Carbonite’s President and CEO. “SMBs realize that a business continuity solution can mean the difference between staying in business or losing everything they’ve worked for, and the data shows they are investing accordingly."
Where does the board’s role begin and end regarding risk? A company’s core objective is to create and increase wealth for its shareholders. Collectively, directors provide leadership toward this objective through two primary functions: 1) decision-making and 2) executive management oversight. Decision-making includes approving corporate policy, strategic goals, annual budgets, major expenditures, and the acquisition or disposal of material assets. It also includes evaluating and selecting the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and approving the company’s risk appetite. Risk appetite is the amount of risk the organization is willing to accept in pursuit of objectives. While it is typically the CEO who recommends a risk appetite to the board, it is the board that should render the ultimate decision on how much risk is appropriate.
The second primary board function involves a fine line regarding the degree of management oversight. Too much, and the board could be micro-managing the company thus infringing on the CEO’s turf. Too little, and the board could lose its pulse on the status of the company’s risk management efforts. Here are five considerations to define a healthy balance between board oversight and management responsibilities pertaining to Enterprise Risk Management (ERM):
Healthcare IT can be a profitable niche for MSPs, and it's an area that's grown rapidly since 2013. But it comes with its own set of complexities. Here's one place where MSPs can get help what they need to break into this market.
Recently we had the honor of interviewing visionary David Sims from South Carolina. He is the owner of the renowned website HIPAAforMSPS.com. This site was created to serve MSP’s who are looking to branch off into the Healthcare IT sector, but don’t know how to go about it.
Healthcare IT is an extremely profitable niche for MSPs to enter into because of its exponential growth since 2013. However, with such a lucrative niche comes a colossal obstacle.
While at RSA, I had the chance to sit down with Piero DePaoli, senior director, Global Product Marketing, Information Security with Symantec. We talked about Symantec’s 2015 Internet Security Threat Report.
DePaoli’s “elevator pitch” summary of the report was broken down into three main categories: cyber attackers are leapfrogging defenses in ways that companies lack insight to anticipate; attackers are moving faster than defenses; and malware used for mass attacks is increasing.
In the first case, attackers leapfrogging defenses, Symantec found that large companies (defined for this study as having at least 2500 employees) are at a surprisingly high risk for a targeted attack. The study showed that five out of six companies were targeted in 2014, an increase of 40 percent from 2013. Smaller companies are at risk, too, with 60 percent of all targeted attacks hitting companies under 2500 employees.
State CIOs hope to secure more federal support for cybersecurity efforts, more details about FirstNet and more options for broadband grants as they meet with officials in Washington, D.C., this week.
Multiple state CIOs are meeting with officials from the White House, federal agencies and Congress Wednesday as part of the NASCIO Midyear Conference to focus attention on state-level IT issues and press for policy changes.
At the top of their priority list is more federal help on cybersecurity, where states are struggling both to fund cybersecurity programs and to lure qualified security professionals into the government workforce. CIOs will talk with White House Cybersecurity Coordinator Michael Daniel, federal lawmakers and representatives from the Department of Homeland Security about ideas for strengthening protection for state and local government information systems.
“Cybersecurity is the No. 1 policy issue for our members,” said Mitch Herckis, NASCIO’s director of government affairs. “The threat is growing and it’s difficult to address.”
The private cloud is the best way to bring enterprise applications and data to a scalable, flexible infrastructure.
The private cloud is a waste of money and will never compare to the public cloud.
With such stark differences of opinion throughout the IT industry, it’s no wonder most enterprises are in a quandary over how much, if anything, to invest in the private cloud.
But as I’ve mentioned in this space numerous times, it does not matter what your peers are doing or what they think. All that really matters is finding solutions to the problems that impede data productivity, and if the best solution happens to be on internal cloud infrastructure, so be it.
Despite the fact that we often see the terms used simultaneously, there actually are significant differences between business intelligence (BI) and data analytics.
If you’re a bit fuzzy on how they differ, Lillian Pierson recently posted a succinct video post explaining the key difference between business intelligence and data science (the rest of us would call that data analytics or Big Data analytics).
Pierson is the founder of Data Mania, a data science consultancy and education company, as well as author of “Data Science for Dummies” (2015). Previously, she worked as a project engineer consultant and a spatial data scientist. I highly recommend following her on Facebook, which is how I found this video.
Combined with built infrastructure, natural habitats can protect shorelines from threats
Natural "green barriers" help protect this Florida coastline and infrastructure from severe storms and floods. (Credit: NOAA).
The resilience of U.S. coastal communities to storms, flooding, erosion and other threats can be strengthened when they are protected by natural infrastructure such as marshes, reefs, and beaches, or with hybrid approaches, such as a “living shoreline” — a combination of natural habitat and built infrastructure, according to a new NOAA study.
The study, published in Environmental Science and Policy, assesses reports and peer-reviewed studies on the strengths and weaknesses of using built infrastructure, such as seawalls or dikes, natural infrastructure, or approaches which combine both. The study focuses on how these approaches help coastal communities reduce their risk of flooding and erosion, as well as additional benefits, and the tradeoffs when decision makers choose one type over another.
“When making coastal protection decisions, it’s important to recognize that built infrastructure only provides benefits when storms are approaching, but natural and hybrid systems provide additional benefits, including opportunities for fishing and recreation, all the time,” said Ariana Sutton-Grier, Ph.D., the study's lead author, member of the research faculty at University of Maryland and NOAA’s National Ocean Service ecosystem science adviser. “Natural and hybrid systems can also improve water quality, provide habitat for many important species, and mitigate carbon going into our atmosphere.”
Examples of coastal defenses including natural infrastructure, managed realignment, and hybrid approaches. (Credit: NOAA).
Threats like coastal erosion, storms and flooding can reshape the shoreline and threaten coastal property. With approximately 350,000 houses, business, bridges and other structures located within 500 feet of the nation’s shoreline, erosion is a problem many U.S. coastal communities are addressing.
Coastal flooding caused by extreme weather events and sea level rise is of growing global concern. As noted in this study, in 2012 there were 11 weather and climate billion-dollar disaster events across the United States, including superstorm Sandy, causing 377 deaths and more than $110 billion in damages. While only two of those were coastal events, Sandy alone was responsible for nearly sixty percent of the damages, at $65 billion (the other, Hurricane Isaac, caused $3 billion in damage). Nationally, these made 2012 the second costliest year on record for weather disasters. Only 2005, which incurred $160 billion in damages due in part to four devastating coastal hurricanes, saw more.
“Coastal resiliency and disaster risk reduction have become a national priority, and healthy coastal ecosystems play an important role in building resilient communities,” said Holly Bamford, Ph.D., acting assistant secretary of commerce for conservation and management at NOAA, and co-author of the study. “We know that sea levels are rising and that coastal communities are becoming more vulnerable to extreme weather- and climate-related events. Now is the time to invest in protection to secure our coasts, but we need to make those investments wisely and with a full understanding of the costs and benefits of different approaches.”
Coral reefs protect shorelines from currents, waves, and storms. Healthy reefs have rough surfaces and complex structures that slow incoming waves — dissipating much of the force. (Credit: NOAA).
The study points out that there is still a need for built approaches in some locations. However, natural or hybrid approaches can be used in many cases.
Some natural ecosystems can maintain themselves, recovering after storm events and reducing the cost of upkeep. Natural habitats such as coral reefs, marshes and dunes can act as buffers for waves, storms and floods. Natural ecosystems also can, in many cases, keep pace with sea level rise, while built infrastructure does not adapt to changing conditions.
“There is a lot of potential innovation with hybrid approaches,” said Katya Wowk, Ph.D., NOAA senior social scientist, and the third co-author of the study. “Hybrid approaches, using both built and natural infrastructure, often provide more cost-effective flood risk reduction options and alternatives for communities when there is not enough space to use natural coastal protection alone.”
Hybrid approaches, such as combining some habitat restoration with openable flood gates or removable flood walls, provide benefits while also providing more storm and erosion protection than natural approaches alone. The study highlights hybrid approaches in the New York City metro area and in Seoul, South Korea, to deal with their monsoon flooding events.
Recently planted rows of American beachgrass will help protect a dune in Sandy Hook, New Jersey. (Credit: NOAA).
“One of the challenging aspects is that these approaches are very new, so we are still learning what works best in which situations and under what circumstances,” said Wowk.
The authors suggest that every location where hybrid and natural approaches are being implemented provide opportunities for monitoring so we can learn as much as possible about each approach, including longer-term cost effectiveness.
“There is no ‘one size fits all’ solution when it comes to what is best for a community in providing coastal protection from flooding,” said Bamford. “We all have to work to innovate, test, monitor, and develop a better suite of options that includes more natural and hybrid infrastructure alternatives for providing coastal protection to communities around the world.”
NOAA’s mission is to understand and predict changes in the Earth's environment, from the depths of the ocean to the surface of the sun, and to conserve and manage our coastal and marine resources. Join us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and our other social media channels.
DENVER – Thursday, April 30, is America’s PrepareAthon! National Day of Action, a grassroots campaign for action to get families, organizations and whole communities better prepared for emergencies. The campaign offers easy-to-use preparedness guides, checklists, and resources to help individuals prepare for common natural hazards and to take action, including downloading alerts and warnings, holding a drill, or safeguarding critical documents.
Despite the devastation that tornadoes, wildfires, and other natural disasters have caused in recent years, nearly 60 percent of surveyed Americans have not participated in a preparedness drill or exercise at their workplace, school, or home in the past year. The Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) Denver-based regional office joins the states of Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming in encouraging the whole community to participate in the America’s PrepareAthon! campaign by performing one of these simple preparedness actions:
- Sign up for local text alerts and warnings and download weather apps to your smartphone.
Stay aware of worsening weather conditions. Visit ready.gov/prepare and download Be Smart: Know Your Alerts and Warnings to learn how to search for local alerts and weather apps relevant for hazards that affect your area.
- Gather important documents and keep them in a safe place.
Have all of your personal, medical, and legal papers in one place, so you can evacuate without worrying about gathering your family’s critical documents at the last minute. Visit ready.gov/prepare and download Be Smart: Protect Your Critical Documents and Valuables for a helpful checklist.
- Create an emergency supply kit.
Bad weather can become dangerous very quickly. Be prepared by creating an emergency supply kit for each member of your family. Visit ready.gov/kit for information on what to include in your kit.
- Develop an emergency communication plan for your family.
It’s possible that your family will be in different locations when a disaster strikes. Come up with a plan so everyone knows how to reach each other and get back together if separated. Visit ready.gov/make-a-plan for communication plan resources.
Every state in FEMA Region VIII has shown support for America’s PrepareAthon! this spring by aligning a variety of preparedness activities with the campaign. The National Weather Service in North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming held statewide tornado drills to prepare residents for severe spring and summer weather; nearly one million Utahns participated in earthquake drills during the Great Utah ShakeOut; and communities throughout Colorado and Montana will hold wildfire preparedness events on May 2 for Wildfire Community Preparedness Day, an America’s PrepareAthon! partner event.
For more information about America’s PrepareAthon!, visit ready.gov/prepare. Follow America’s PrepareAthon! on Twitter using the handle @Prepareathon and #PrepareAthon.
You could leap onto your desk, wave both fists in the air, and scream ‘Why, why, why?’ You could organise a whip-round in your company and invite colleagues to give generously to ‘help save our business continuity’. You could even just accept the cut. After all, whose budget isn’t being cut nowadays? Tempting as these options may seem, they do however suffer from (at least) one major drawback. They are unlikely to get your business continuity budget reinstated in full afterwards. You need a better plan. One that can see you through a rough period, help you get your budget back to where it should be, and even prevent a cut in the first place. Read on for further details.
I recently spoke to directors and officers about oversight of risk management by boards of directors. I prepared a list of 25 reasons that risk management failure happens, based on my experience assisting boards, including boards that have failed and boards that cannot afford to fail. Almost all of what follows below is based on real examples. I have never encountered a risk management failure where the board was not at fault, based on what the board said or did, or failed to say or do.
Here are 25 reasons for risk management failure:
(TNS) -- When Jordan Soto’s father called 911 from his cellphone while she was having a medical emergency, the call was routed to a dispatch center 30 miles away.
Soto lived within a quarter-mile from a Santa Barbara, Calif., fire station, but responders didn’t make it to her home in time, and the 24-year-old died from an accidental drug overdose.
“That shouldn’t have happened,” said Assemblyman Das Williams, D-Santa Barbara. “They got there when it was too late.”
A new California Assembly bill calls for a two-year study to improve accuracy in pinpointing locations of 911 calls made from cellphones. AB 510 seeks to explore ways to eliminate unnecessary delays in emergency care for people in need. The bill was unanimously approved this month by one Assembly committee and now heads to another.
WASHINGTON – A recent Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) survey found that nearly 60 percent of American adults have not practiced what to do in a disaster by participating in a disaster drill or preparedness exercise at work, school, or home in the past year. Further, only 39 percent of respondents have developed an emergency plan and discussed it with their household. This is despite the fact that 80 percent of Americans live in counties that have been hit with a weather-related disaster since 2007, as reported by the Washington Post. With the number and severity of weather-related disasters on the rise, the America’s PrepareAthon! is an opportunity for individuals, organizations, and communities to take action to prepare for specific hazards through group discussions, drills, and exercises.
“When it comes to preparedness, practice makes perfect,” said FEMA Administrator Craig Fugate. “America’s PrepareAthon! is about taking action now to better prepare yourself, your family, and your community to be ready to respond to these events before they occur.”
America’s PrepareAthon! is a national community-based campaign that provides free, easy-to-use guides, checklists, and resources to get more people to take action to prepare every day. On April 30, individuals, families, workplaces, schools and organizations will come together to practice simple actions to stay safe before, during, and after emergencies relevant to their area. Examples include:
- Sign up for local text alerts and warnings and download weather apps to your smartphone.
- Develop an emergency communication plan for your family. This will help you be in touch if a disaster strikes and family members are in different locations.
- Collect important documents and keep them in a safe place. This will help you evacuate without delay and get back on track after the disaster passes.
- Gather emergency supplies. Pack a “go bag” to evacuate quickly and have supplies in the home to be safe without water or power.
Visit the America’s PrepareAthon! website, ready.gov/prepare to take action, be counted and spread the word.
America’s PrepareAthon! was established to provide a comprehensive campaign to build and sustain national preparedness as directed by Presidential Policy Directive-8. The campaign is coordinated by FEMA in collaboration with federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial governments, the private sector, and non-governmental organizations.
In the children’s story, “The Three Little Pigs,” the Big Bad Wolf tried a frontal assault by blowing the first two pigs’ houses down. By the end of the story, the pigs had come together, and through the preparation and efforts of the third pig building a house of bricks, taken refuge in the brick house and withstood the Wolf’s attack. In today’s world with a global economy, e-commerce, and utilization of technology to do business, the Big Bad Wolf will not knock on the front door. Instead, the Big Bad Wolf sits at home in its den using a computer to hack the data network and steal customer information, back accounts, social security numbers, and money. A brick house in today’s business environment is a strong and robust cybersecurity program. From direct deposits and online shopping to phishing and identify theft, the benefits and risks from increasing reliance on electronics and technology add another lawyer of compliance that businesses, ownership, management, and industries must not only recognize but immediately integrate and sustain for continued success and survival. This is why cybersecurity programs are necessary and invaluable to any company’s success and survival.
Cybersecurity is no longer a concern for just financial institutions, government agencies, or multi-national conglomerates. Any business involved in utilizing technology and electronics to engage with its customers and enter the business marketplace is subject to attack. Every day thousands of companies big and small and in various market and industry sectors are besieged by cybercriminals. By being proactive, committed, and vested in cybersecurity, a company, regardless of size, market, or industry, can prepare, implement, and sustain best practices, policies, and procedures that will help it defend against cyberattacks. Although not exhaustive, and priorities can change dependent upon risk and exposure, three primary areas a company can start with are active monitoring and assessments, implementation of the U.S. Commerce Department’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity (CS) Framework, and employee training.
(TNS) — When tornadoes like the one that struck Moore last month are imminent, forecasters can often warn residents about them a few days in advance.
But weather researchers at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Severe Storms Laboratory and elsewhere are working on a new method they hope will allow emergency responders to prepare weeks ahead of time when tornadoes are likely.
Harold Brooks, senior research scientist at the Norman-based laboratory, said scientists could be a few years away from being able to release seasonal forecasts for tornadoes. Rather than predicting individual outbreaks, those forecasts would predict how likely tornadoes were over the course of a few weeks or an entire season, he said.
“The important experiments have been done,” Brooks said.
At the Qonnections 2015 Global Partner 2015 conference today, Qlik unveiled an update to its data visualization platform that adds self-service capabilities while at the same time providing simpler access to external data sources.
In addition, Qlik unveiled an implementation of the Qlik Analytics Platform aimed specifically at developers and announced the general availability of multiple services on Qlik Cloud, an implementation of the Qlik platform running on Amazon Web Services (AWS) that is designed to make it easier for end users to share data.
Josh Good, director of product marketing for Qlik, says Qlik Sense 2.0 extends the company’s core QIX Associative Indexing Engine technology in ways that make it simpler to visualize data and create reports, while still giving IT organizations the level of governance needed to meet regulatory requirements.
(TNS) — Monday’s predicted sunny skies will make the events of April 27, 2011, seem like a distant memory, but those who are responsible for emergency response services will ever be watchful.
Four years ago Monday, three tornadoes tore through Cullman County, Ala., bringing a day of destruction to communities across the area. The sunrise tornado in the Hanceville area started the disaster. After a lull, an EF-4 tornado came through downtown Cullman and another came into Fairview and other areas of the county.
Immediately following the tornado outbreak, which devastated Tuscaloosa and many other areas of the state, residents began rebuilding, and as Cullman Mayor Max Townson recalls, an economic surge began to take place.
It occurs to me that as the Internet of Things emerges as a topic of increasing relevance to CIOs, one of the things they’re going to need to be concerned about is standards. As the cloud-to-cloud integration that is necessarily associated with IoT becomes more commonplace, that integration will entail the adoption of certain standards that may or may not be in place at this point. So where is all of this heading?
I had the opportunity to discuss this topic with Shane Dyer, CEO of Arrayent, an IoT platform provider in Redwood City, Calif. To kick off the discussion, I asked Dyer what role industry associations like the IPSO Alliance, the Cloud Computing Association, and the Cloud Industry Forum are playing in advancing cloud-to-cloud integration, and how effective they’ve been in this regard. He said Arrayent’s customers at this point aren’t asking them to conform to or recommend any cloud-to-cloud integration standard, which tells him that standards organizations working in this area could improve their market education and visibility efforts:
Big Data and the Internet of Things (IoT) seem all but unstoppable these days, so the only question that remains is how the data center will evolve to handle such a large and diverse load.
To many, the cloud will become a crucial resource regardless of any lingering doubts over security and availability. There is only so much a single data center can handle, and unless the enterprise plans on going broke buying new hardware, the vast majority of Big Data and IoT storage and processing will have to take place on third-party infrastructure.
This is not necessarily bad news for the current IT vendor community, though, as it will likely lead to a data center building boom. According to IDC, data center capacity among service providers will jump more than seven-fold between now and 2019 as the cloud community seeks to provide the anytime, anywhere, anyhow connectivity and context that are the hallmarks of the IoT. The development of large capacity facilities will be tied to additional compute and storage deployment at the edge, as well as increased use of analytics and intelligent platforms designed to bring the management burdens of such a diverse infrastructure under control.
The close relationship between the Internet of Things (IoT) and Big Data is an intuitive one. The IoT will create a ton of information, which is precisely what Big Data is designed to handle. They really are different sides of the same coin.
Even things that seem to be made for each other don’t go together without a lot of work, however. Outscale technical writer and blogger Will Hayles uses a guest column at Datamation to describe the two intersecting techniques. The biggest companies have the money to hire people to plan well into the future. They are developing an understanding of the nexus of Big Data and the IoT. Other companies must get wise as well, he writes:
While larger enterprises like Coca-Cola, General Electric, and Domino’s Pizza have managed to tap into its value, most businesses will have to wait some time before they can really enjoy the advantages of embedded sensor technology. In the meantime, it’s imperative that those businesses prepare by adopting a big data strategy - and looking into analytics technology.
Within the next five years, the number of people connected to the Internet is forecast to rise to over 7 billion. The number of things hooked up to the web is projected to be around 50 billion. While the Internet of Things (IoT) still has to fulfil certain promises, the base is already there. From wearable fitness trackers to office building intrusion detection, the range of items being linked to the web is already wide. The natural and growing reflex is to consider the risk involved and appropriate risk management. But which kind of risk are we talking about?
NEW ORLEANS—Seventy-nine percent of companies are aligned with their risk management reporting structure, however, only 27% of risk professionals believe that emerging risks will be a company priority in the coming year, according to the 12th annual “Excellence in Risk Management Survey” released here by Marsh and RIMS.
In the last five or six years, “We have seen significant narrowing of the gap, where there is better alignment of what risk managers and risk executives are providing their organization and what their C-suite and management is looking for and needing in this riskier world that we all live in,” said Brian Elowe, a managing director at Marsh and co-author of the report. Findings are based on more than 300 responses to an online survey and a series of focus groups with leading risk executives.
Aon Risk Solutions has published its annual list of the key risks as identified by its clients across the globe. For the first time cyber risk has entered the top 10 at number 9 , reinforcing its emergence as a key risk factor. Damage to brand and reputation was cited as the top overall concern facing global organizations, further underscoring the increasing importance of cyber risk as it has been regularly linked to brand and reputation issues in the wake of data breaches.
Aon’s global clients strongly felt that damage to brand and reputation ranked as a top concern across almost all regions and industries. This can be attributed to the growing challenges businesses are facing amongst the risks found in the top 10 list, such as cyber risk, but also including business interruption, property damage and failure to innovate.
The 1400 survey respondents to the Aon Global Risk Management Survey included CEOs, CFOs and Risk Managers providing comparative insight into different perceptions of risk. Typically, financial and economic risks including commodity price risk, economic slowdown and technology failure were seen as damaging at C-suite level with risk managers focused on liability-related risks such as cyber, property damage and third party liability.
Batteries are a common site at most data centers, but while they typically form the heart of emergency backup architectures, there are growing signs that they could emerge as primary, or at least co-primary, power sources as well.
This trend seems to be part and parcel to the steadily increasing use of hydro, solar and other renewables to power the data center, as well as the rise of low-power, modular infrastructure in cloud-facing, hyperscale facilities.
Microsoft, for one, has been experimenting with a number of battery technologies for a while now, ostensibly to lower operating costs of its Azure cloud. In one project, the company has come up with a new lithium ion design called the Local Energy Storage (LES) unit, according to tech journalist Timothy Prickett Morgan. The system features the normal Panasonic cell that powers microservers and other devices, but rather than hang it off the side of the server, Microsoft dropped it into the switched mode power supply in the Open Cloud Server architecture. In this way, power can go directly to existing circuits without additional wiring and components. This also removes the battery from the path between the power source and the motherboard, ultimately reducing the load on bulk capacitors in backup power systems. The batteries cost only a few dollars when purchased in bulk and are estimated to cut operating costs by about a quarter.
It’s easy to type cast analytics. After all, it so easy fits in with BI that we tend to want to think about Big Data as a tool for business analysts, finance and IT leaders. But nobody puts Big Data in a corner, and a recent DC Velocity article shows why.
If you’re unfamiliar with the magazine/website, DC Velocity covers supply chain and logistics, and the piece is actually a republished CSCMP Supply Chain Quarterly journal article. The point of the article is to show how Big Data analytics can be useful to supply chain leaders, but it actually makes the case for why all managers should educate themselves on analytics.
“Without a full understanding of what the field of analytics is about, supply chain managers may be missing out on many opportunities—both for their companies and for themselves,” the article states.
Wireless Emergency Alert (WEA) messages need to be longer, URLs should be included, message order must be changed and more outreach is needed, according to a new study conducted for the U.S. DHS.
The Comprehensive Testing of Imminent Threat Public Messages for Mobile Devices study used focus groups, interviews, post-incident surveys and experiments to thoroughly examine WEA messages. With $980,000 provided by the Commerce Department to DHS’ Science and Technology (S&T) Directorate, the study was conducted by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START) at the University of Maryland. The study’s principal investigator, Brooke Fisher Liu, said the empirical-based guidance “can potentially help alert originators improve how they currently craft and disseminate WEAs.”
Denis Gusty, a program manager with DHS S&T, said he was not surprised by any of the research findings, but hopes stakeholders will read the report and make adjustments where appropriate by putting the information into practice. Suggested changes relative to message length and content are already under consideration by key stakeholders charged with making WEA recommendations to the FCC through the Communications Security, Reliability and Interoperability Council.
(TNS) — The most powerful earthquake to hit Nepal in more than eight decades roared across the impoverished mountain kingdom just before noon Saturday, killing more than 1,800 people, some as far away as India and Bangladesh, and devastating a crowded base camp at Mt. Everest.
Signature buildings collapsed in the ancient Old Katmandu quarter of the capital, including the Dharahara Tower, a 200-foot-tall structure built in 1832. Emergency response officials said at least 60 tourists were buried under rubble while visiting the popular site at the busiest time of day. Other historic buildings in Katmandu Valley’s UNESCO-designated heritage sites were also damaged or destroyed by the magnitude 7.8 temblor, including Patan Durbar Square.
“Responders are trying to dig people out,” said Prajana W. Pradham of the CARE relief agency. “This quake was so big.”
Officials said the death toll was likely to increase dramatically, perhaps to as many as 10,000, as emergency response crews reach more remote areas of the country of 28 million.
Today’s threat landscape isn’t getting quieter. In fact, cyber criminals are getting smarter. The “same old same old” just won’t cut it when you’ve got to select an endpoint security solution for use in today’s increasingly toxic threat landscape.
The cold, hard truth is that today’s threat landscape isn’t getting quieter. In fact, cybercriminals are getting smarter. Just consider the three V’s--volume, velocity and variety--that characterize the current endpoint security environment:
Planning, training and exercising are supposed to be continuous in the emergency management field. The question is, when are you done? When is good, good enough? At what time do you reach the point of diminishing returns?
For planning, it never seems to end. Once a plan is written, you have to train people to the plan and then exercise it with those people and outsiders too. In both training and exercising, you will find gaps in your plan document. This comes from having more eyeballs on the document, and then the act of exercising the plan will reveal areas that either were not addressed at all or are in need of revision.
(TNS) — Using some of its strongest language to date, the Oklahoma Geological Survey said Tuesday the state's ongoing earthquake swarm is "very unlikely to represent a naturally occurring process."
The state survey said the suspected source of triggered earthquakes is the use of wastewater disposal wells that dump large amounts of water produced along with oil production.
"The observed seismicity of greatest concentration, namely in central and north-central Oklahoma, can be observed to follow the oil and gas plays characterized by large amounts of produced water," the report stated. "Seismicity rates are observed to increase after a time-delay as injection volumes increase within these plays. In north central and north-central Oklahoma, this time-delay can be weeks to a year or more."
(TNS) — Nearly half of all Americans — 150 million people — are threatened by possibly damaging shaking from earthquakes, scientists said Wednesday at a meeting of the Seismological Society of America.
That figure, from all 50 states and Puerto Rico, is a sharp jump from the figure in 1994, when the Federal Emergency Management Agency estimated just 75 million Americans in 39 states were at risk from earthquakes.
The authors of the study, which included the U.S. Geological Survey, said the sharp increase in exposure to quake damage was largely because of population increases in areas prone to earthquakes, particularly California, said William Leith, a coauthor and senior science advisor for earthquake and geologic hazards at the U.S. Geological Survey.
As an emergency manager, one of the easiest questions to answer is: Why do we do what we do? Thoughts of preventing loss of life and protecting property for our families, neighbors and all members of our community and nation quickly spring to mind. A frequent follow-on question can be more complex: That sounds important, how do you make sure you get it done right?
As we answer this next question, we may recall the problems we solved: the time we found a flaw in our response plan that we quickly fixed, or the moments in the Emergency Operations Center when we relied on our team and our training to make the right decisions. Indeed, it is our ability to problem-solve effectively that keeps emergency management so dynamic. Whether we work in preparedness, mitigation, response or recovery, as we identify solutions to address the worst-of-the-worst that could happen (or has happened) to our communities, we act as agents of dynamic change.
This dynamism goes all the way to our core, as even our foundational structure and methodology have evolved significantly since the turn of the century. In recent years we have redefined our relationship with homeland security; we have learned our place under one National Incident Management System; the list could go on. This ongoing evolution, empowered by our willingness to identify our weaknesses and strengthen them, is a core reason why our community is so strong.
By Gary Hinson and Dejan Kosutic
Most business continuity experts from an IT background are primarily, if not exclusively, concerned with establishing the ability to recover failed IT services after a serious incident or disaster. While disaster recovery is a necessary part of business continuity, this article promotes the strategic business value of resilience: a more proactive and holistic approach for preparing not only IT services, but also other business processes before an incident in order that an organization will survive incidents that would otherwise have taken it down, and so keep the business operating in some form during and following an incident.
According to the BSI Standard 100-4 (2009), “Business continuity management consists of a planned and organized procedure for sustainably increasing the resilience of (time-)critical business processes of an organization, reacting appropriately to events resulting in damages, and enabling the resumption of business activities as quickly as possible. The goal of business continuity management is to ensure that important business processes are only interrupted temporarily or not interrupted at all, even in critical situations, and to ensure the economic existence of the organization even after incurring serious damage.”
Is business continuity important enough to invest time, effort, and money into achieving it? Given that the alternative implies accepting the risk that the business will quite likely fold in a crisis, few in management would seriously argue against business continuity, but that still leaves the questions of how much to invest, and how to invest wisely. These are strategic issues: business continuity is a strategic concern.
When Anthem, the second largest insurance provider in the United States, revealed recently that its records had been compromised by hackers — resulting in the possible leaking of personal data of more than 80 million present and former customers — the incident became a much-needed wake-up call for the health care industry.
Unfortunately, Anthem is not the first company to experience a major data breach in the past 18 months. In 2014 alone, customer data, credit card information and intellectual property were stolen from Target, Home Depot, JPMorgan Chase, Sony Pictures and many others. What recent history has taught us is that hackers are becoming more sophisticated, attacks are becoming more malicious and no industry or organization is invulnerable.
The public has moved on from asking, “How did this happen?” to asking, “Why does this keep happening?” The attention on privacy rights coupled with the growing costs of major data breaches are elevating the issue of managing the digital enterprise to the board level.
We are in the midst of experiencing one of the most monumental shifts in the information technology age to date—an evolution from self-managed IT to IT as a service. With a public cloud services market estimated by Gartner to exceed $244 billion by 2017, service providers looking to capitalize on this tremendous opportunity must be focused on rapid time to market and deliver exceptional managed services to their customers.
However, like most of us, service providers of all types and sizes are being challenged to do more with less, to enable faster R&D cycles, and to accelerate customer acquisition growth while reducing overall spend. It is for these reasons that many MSPs have been looking to leverage VMware’s as-a-service offerings: When it makes sense for their business, partners can opt to buy--as a complement to what they’ve built--ready-to-run infrastructure and desktop services, and focus on delivering managed services on top.
(TNS) — If a hurricane is closing in on your neighborhood, the National Weather Service wants you to know what you will likely face.
So it is creating an interactive map on its homepage to tell you how your home in any particular storm could be affected by strong winds, torrential rains, storm surge or flooding.
"It communicates the local threat of each hurricane hazard," Pablo Santos, meteorologist in charge of the weather service's Miami office, said Tuesday. "It's meant to be realistic in terms of what to prepare for."
While the goal is to have it up and running by the June 1 start of hurricane season, Santos said it is still "under construction" and may not be available until the heart of the season in mid-August, or possibly even next year.
It ought to go without saying that a volunteer firefighter isn’t going to perpetrate a sex crime or rob a house when he’s supposed to be dousing the flames. Apparently it isn’t that obvious.
Last year New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed a law requiring background checks to ensure volunteer firefighters weren’t carrying sex offense convictions. It’s up to individual fire companies to decide whether a prospective volunteer is fit to serve, in spite of a past sex offense, but everyone gets screened.
In Rush County, Ind., volunteers for Community Emergency Response Teams (CERTs) must submit to an even broader check, one that encompasses all past criminal history.
An ‘alternate workspace’ (either at your own locations, or contracted through a 3rd party provider) can be a vital component of a viable Business Continuity strategy; but only if the strategy works as intended.
An earlier article discussed Alternate Site Logistics – transportation, access and accommodations. But you’ll also need to make sure to build technical access into every BCP which may rely on an alternate site strategy.
Let’s assume in that hypothetical Alternate Workspace strategy the designated employees arrive safely and are granted access to their alternate workspace.
One of the questions that underlie much of what is discussed in the telecommunications and IT world is whether the end game is a world of unemployed people. When will IBM Watson and other cognitive computing platforms evolve to the point that they make analysts unnecessary? When will robots become so sophisticated that all the nurses and home health care givers will be out of work? When will drones replace the neighborhood ice cream truck?
These are important questions, but ones that are not strictly limited to the IT/telecom realm. After all, engineers make the weapons. Politicians, legislators and administrators decide how to use them.
If you are familiar with IT security testing for organisations, you have probably heard of the concept of a kill chain. This is a route by which an attacker can achieve a given goal (steal data or sabotage an IT installation, for instance). Kill chains as their name suggests are composed of several links or stages through which an attacker moves to home in on the target result. As efficiency as well as effectiveness is part of business continuity, why reinvent the wheel? The kill chain could provide insights here as well.
The words “rip and replace” are among the most feared in the IT lexicon—right up there with “denial of service” and “The CIO wants you in his office right now.”
But now that the enterprise is contemplating a data environment that will propel business into the 21st Century, some organizations are giving serious consideration to wholesale replacement of aging infrastructure. In an increasingly interconnected world, it has not gone unnoticed that many emerging markets are already building forward-leaning data environments atop gleaming new hardware platforms.
Indeed, says EuroCloud co-founder Phil Wainewright, those who don’t embrace some level of rip-and-replace will find themselves outclassed by rivals who do. When the pace of change is moving at hyperspeed, delay is the enemy—it not only limits your ability to compete, it makes the inevitable change that much harder as new systems and software become integrated with the old.
This week, I’m attending the 2015 RSA Conference where I’ve had the chance to mingle with security professionals and other security writers, as well as get to sit in on some interesting sessions. I was invited to attend a panel discussion hosted by Nok Nok Labs. The panel included Nok Nok’s CEO Philip Dunkelberger; Jon Oltsik, a security analyst at Enterprise Strategy Group; Rhonda MacLean, a former CISO with a number of companies including Bank of America and Boeing; and Giles Watkins, a partner in the cybersecurity practice at KPMG.
The discussion—with quite a bit of audience participation, I should add—revolved around the opening question posed by Oltsik: Why is it taking so long for industry to embrace security?
Rapid economic growth in emerging economies, labour disruptions, political instability and a disease outbreak in West Africa led to a rise in business losses in 2014 according to the latest Global Supply Chain Intelligence report from BSI Supply Chain Solutions. Globally over $23 billion was lost to cargo theft in 2014 from a variety of supply chain threats, while the four most economically damaging natural disasters caused a collective $32.8 billion of damage. Within Europe, trade interruption due to an array of strikes throughout the continent caused $1.5 billion of direct losses to business.
The scale of the problem was demonstrated in the Business Continuity Institute’s most recent Supply Chain Resilience report which revealed that over three quarters (76%) of respondents to a survey had experienced a supply chain disruption during the previous year and almost a quarter (23.6%) had reported cumulative losses in excess of €1 million during that time.
David Horlock, Managing Director, BSI APAC commented: “Companies are facing an increasingly wide range of challenges to their supply chain, from human rights issues to natural disasters. Such complexity creates black holes of risk for organizations, both directly affecting the bottom line but perhaps more seriously, hidden supply chain risk, damaging a company’s hard-earned reputation.”
Port congestion and strikes continued to severely affect business continuity across Asia Pacific, the west coast of the United States and Germany throughout 2014. Limited container storage space resulted in cargo discharge times of up to a week, increasing operational costs for companies shipping through Hong Kong by nearly $1 million per month. General strikes across Belgium caused $1billion of direct losses to business, while airline strikes in France and Germany cost $300 million and $198 million respectively.
While the report highlights cargo theft as a growing risk, it is still outweighed by the economic impact of natural disasters. 2014’s top four natural disasters caused a collective $32.8 billion of damage to businesses, with flooding across Pakistan and India making up a third of this figure. Three quarters (75%) of the top exporters across the Asia-Pacific region are rated high or severe for natural disaster risk.
So when was the last time you found what you wanted in a document without having to dig through pages and pages of information? Do you find that so much of what is in the document doesn’t really need to be there? Is it irrelevant? Is it fluff material just so the volume of the document looks good? In many cases it turns out the document is basically built on the foundation of quantity over quality. That means most of the document – the stuff yo don’t need – is just fluff. Are your Business Continuity Plans (BCP) like that? I beat they are.
From document to document, there is repeated information that also has its own document to strat with. As an example, I recently came across a set of BCP plans with a client that held allot of the same Emergency Response information contained within the Emergency Response Plan itself. Why? It was fluff to the BCP – which was labeled a Business Recovery Plan (BRP) – and repeated information from other areas too. What’s the point?
(TNS) — What’s gone wrong with the weather?
Ever since California began drying out four years ago, Noah Diffenbaugh and his crew of earth scientists at Stanford University have been working on that question. They’re on a mission, like detectives breaking down a psychological profile of a bad guy — only this hunt is done with calculators and computer models.
Their bad guy is the drought, one of the worst in California’s recorded history. And one of the most mysterious.
What’s most clearly known is this: A huge dome of stagnant air has spent much of the past four winters parked off the West Coast, driving the storm path far north of California. In years past, it would periodically slide south, letting in rain to the lowlands and snow to the mountains. Now, it hardly budges.
That’s where Diffenbaugh takes up the hunt. What has changed? Why did it change? And is that change permanent?
The growing prevalence of ‘shadow IT’ is not expected to slow down this year. Having emerged over the last year or so, this threat will continue to be of concern for managed service providers (MSPs) that are looking to protect cloud data and maintain integrity in cloud-based file sharing. In order to do, we discuss six steps for improving cloud security against shadow IT.
Shadow IT, as described to TechRadar by Perry Gale, VP of workflow at Nintex, “concerns the unauthorized use of hardware and software that is not supported by an organization’s central IT department. In many cases, the IT department has not approved the technology or doesn’t even know that employees are using it.”
The Ebola crisis, also a pandemic because of cases in different countries, has hit the nation of Sierra Leone the hardest. National and international health teams have worked round the clock to contain the disease and prevent new outbreaks. Pharmaceuticals companies have ramped up efforts to develop new vaccines. Sierra Leone counts almost 12,000 people infected with the increases in both city and travelling populations major contributing factors. Recently, the Ebola response team in Sierra Leone tried a new tactic that was in stark contrast with previous measures. The tactic could be summed up in one word – Don’t!
A cyber attack could cost a business its investor backing, according to new research by KPMG. A survey of global institutional investors found that 79 percent of investors would be discouraged from investing in a business that has been hacked. The research surveyed 133 global institutional investors with USD$3+ trillion under management.
The survey also found that investors believe less than half of the boards of the companies that they currently invest in have adequate skills to manage cyber risk. Furthermore, they believe that 43 percent of board members have unacceptable skills and knowledge to manage innovation and risk in the digital world. This sentiment was mirrored in a recent KPMG survey of FTSE 350 businesses which found that 39 percent of boards and management agreed they were severely lacking in their understanding of this area.
Malcolm Marshall, global head of KPMG’s cyber security practice, comments:
“Investors see data breaches as a threat to a company’s material value and feel discouraged in investing in a business that has had its sensitive information compromised.”
“Following a number of high profile breaches, we are seeing global investors waking up to the issue of cyber security. The ripple effect of this has seen investor appetite for cyber businesses increase, with the survey revealing that 86 percent of investors see it as a growth area.
“There is an expectation from investors for businesses to increase their cyber capabilities from top to bottom, including the board. In a world where breaches are common, is reasonable to expect boards to have prepared themselves. My personal experience of working with organizations that have been breached is that businesses that are generally well run and understand risk, are better prepared for future risks. A serious breach brings the competence and team work of senior executives and the board into sharp focus. What we are seeing is companies struggling to demonstrate that they are taking cyber risk seriously to their existing and potential investor base. The inability to demonstrate that a business is doing so could make it a less attractive investment proposition.
“A good start would be for boards to elevate cyber higher up on the agenda and invest more time towards it. Our survey reveals that 86 percent of investors want to see an increase on the time boards spend on cyber compared to last year.”
Malcolm Marshall suggests that boards need to consider the following to be cyber secure:
- Board directors need to understand and approach cyber security as a business risk issue, not just a problem for IT.
- Directors need to understand the legal implications of cyber risks as they relate to their company’s specific circumstances.
- Boards should have sufficient cyber security expertise, and discussions about cyber risk management should be given regular and adequate time on the boardroom agenda.
- Directors should set the expectation that management will establish a firm wide cyber risk management framework that has adequate scope for staffing and budget.
- Discussions of cyber risk should include identification of which risks to avoid, accept, mitigate, or transfer, as well as specific plans associated with each approach.
The UK Government’s Centre for the Protection of National Infrastructure (CPNI) has published a new document which gives advice on handling supply chain vulnerabilities.
‘Mitigating Security Risk in the National Infrastructure Supply Chain a Good Practice Guide For Employers’ recommends that organizations should view supply chain security risk as being an extension of existing arrangements to mitigate security risk within the organization itself. To achieve this a supply chain security risk mitigation implementation plan is required which includes:
- Comprehensive mapping of all tiers of the upstream and downstream supply chains to the level of individual contracts.
- Risk scoring each contract to link in to the organization’s existing security risk assessment.
- Due diligence/accreditation/assurance of suppliers (and potential suppliers) and the adoption, through contracts, of proportionate and appropriate measures to mitigate risk.
- Audit arrangements and compliance monitoring.
- Contract exit arrangements.
Read the document (PDF).
When you do a test, you aim to pass it but when designing exercises, it’s best to fail them so you learn the maximum amount—especially what is wrong…
Testing business continuity plans is vital because, clearly, that’s the only way to ensure that a business continuity plan works in reality as well as on paper. However, as Peter Frielinghaus, Senior Advisor at ContinuitySA points out, validating the business continuity plan is itself a process more than an event: “That’s why the ISO 22301 standard requires exercising and testing of business continuity procedures to ensure they meet your objectives and are reliable,” says Mr. Frielinghaus. “To my mind, the exercising is where the most value lies because it helps the organization assess where it is and where it needs to improve, whereas a test simply delivers a pass or fail.”
“When you do a test, you aim to pass it but when designing exercises, it’s best to fail them so you learn the maximum amount — especially what is wrong.”
Exercises allow organizations to rehearse plans, verify information in plans and train all relevant personnel, including their deputies,
Frielinghaus notes. He goes on to say that aside from being robust, exercises need to be carefully constructed to be realistic in regard to likely threats and a company’s business.
“To give an extreme example, doing an exercise focused on tsunamic damage for a company that is based inland would reduce buy-in from employees,” he says. “It’s also good advice to begin gradually with fairly simple exercises, building up in complexity as the teams become more proficient and your sense of the organization’s actual level of business continuity maturity becomes more exact.”
Following this approach will enable the organization to confirm whether its business continuity capability reflects its scale and complexity; that its business continuity plan works; and that its business continuity management programme meets its policy objectives. Perhaps most important of all, Frielinghaus says, an ongoing programme of exercises would ensure that the organization’s business continuity capability is continually being improved.
As a guide, Frielinghaus says that over a 12-month cycle, the exercises should test whether the equipment required by the plan works, that procedures and plans are correct and dovetail with each other, and that procedures are manageable. In addition, the exercises should be designed to reveal whether the required recovery time objective for business process can be met, and whether the personnel involved have the skills, authority and experience needed.
Key elements for the success of any exercise are that every participant undertakes to document his or her experience and recommendations for review, and that problems are highlighted.
“Remember that the exercise is testing the plan and not the participants, and that it is not testing what caused the disruption in the first place, or the measures put in place to mitigate risks,” Frielinghaus concludes. “It’s particularly important to remember that an exercise is not a test, and thus that it’s preferable to fail in order to learn as much as possible.”
As information, computing and data communications technologies evolve, business demand for data centre / center services grows simultaneously. That demand is split into two parts; public cloud, where computing is available on demand and delivered from data centres owned and operated by large US-based corporations, and commercial data centres. It’s vital that companies understand which method will prove most beneficial for their business.
As the hybrid cloud model’s popularity grows, so does the trend of businesses moving from in-house to a combination of external colocation and on-demand public cloud services. The flexibility of public cloud means choosing a provider is simple and if the cloud service provider does not meet business needs, moving is equally simple. This is not the case with colocation, where the choice of an external data centre requires care, thought and research. With this in mind, there are five key points companies should consider when looking for a safe, secure and reliable data centre to host their own critical equipment:
Social media gaffes know no corporate hierarchy. With more and more execs using and being encouraged to use Social Media, the instant and public ramification of a gaffe, blunder, or exploit the stakes keep rising. These can result in much more than embarrassment for the perpetrator and their company. Ramifications and fallout can include spreading malware, mishandling the PII of high profile individuals, violating federal regulations, or triggering the scrutiny of regulatory bodies.
In February, Twitter CFO Anthony Noto’s account was hacked and some 698 spammy tweets were sent out from his account over an eight-minute period.
At the BCI Middle East Conference in May, to be held at the Oryx Rotana in Doha, Qatar, the Business Continuity Institute Qatar Forum will launch its Qatar Business Continuity Management Guideline. The guideline was a collaborative effort of a small Working Committee representing various organizations in Qatar, and the members are also active participants in the recently established BCI Qatar Forum. In developing the guideline, the BCI Qatar Forum was supported by the Directorate of laboratories and standardization within Qatar's Ministry of Environment.
This new guideline is designed to help all types of organizations operating in Qatar, whether business, charity or government, and regardless of sector, size, location or activity, to be better-prepared and more confident to handle business disruptions of any type.
Incidents take many forms, ranging from large-scale natural disasters or acts of terror to single technology-related failures, or utility services interruptions. Most incidents are small but some can have a significant impact on an organization, multiple organizations, or on the State of Qatar as a whole. This therefore makes business continuity management relevant at all times and at all levels. Complex inter-dependencies between organizations also make it important to ensure business continuity across the whole value chain, from receipt of goods and services from suppliers to delivery of products and services to customers, and to ensure there is an effective BCM information exchange with a range of stakeholders.
Based on the various international Standards in business continuity, and in particular ISO 22301, the guideline describes how to set up, implement and manage an effective Business Continuity Management System. The Guideline also provides guidance on interpreting ISO 22301 requirements, as well as local examples and templates to adapt and use.
"There is an increasing global awareness that organizations in the public and private sectors must know how to prepare for and respond to unexpected and disruptive events, to ensure business continuity and maintain their operations and the Qatar BCM Guideline will help all organizations in Qatar achieve this" said Abdullatif Ali Al-Yafei, Chairman of the Qatar BCM Guideline Working Committee.”
Target (TGT) last week said it would pay MasterCard (MA) issuers up to $19 million pre-tax in alternative recovery payments related to the retailer's Dec. 2013 data breach. And as a result, Target and MasterCard top this week's list of IT security newsmakers, followed by the Data Security and Breach Notification Act of 2015, HSBC (HSBC) and Verizon (VZ).
What can managed service providers (MSPs) and their customers learn from these IT security newsmakers? Check out this week's list of IT security stories to watch to find out:
Mapping tool visualizes anticipated flood effects, aiding preparation for coastal storms
April 21, 2015
Charleston, South Carolina, was found to be one of the top ten U.S. cities in increased nuisance flooding, according to a June 2014 NOAA report. The Coastal Flood Exposure Mapper enables users to visualize these flood impacts and others in order to craft better resilience plans.". (Image: NOAA)
A NOAA flood exposure risk mapping tool that was developed in New York, New Jersey, Delaware and Pennsylvania has now been expanded to cover coastal areas along the entire U.S. East Coast and Gulf of Mexico. The Coastal Flood Exposure Mapper, a deliverable of President Obama’s Climate Action Plan, provides users with maps, data, and information to assess risks and vulnerabilities related to coastal flooding and hazards.
According to the 2010 U.S. Census Bureau population count, 39 percent of the U.S. population lives in counties subject to significant coastal flooding.
“Coastal populations are increasing, as is the potential for flood events,” said Jeffrey L. Payne, Ph.D., acting director of NOAA’s Office for Coastal Management. “Anything we can do to make people aware of their community’s vulnerability puts that community in a better position to act to save lives and property.”
With this NOAA tool, users select their location and the flood scenario of their choosing: Federal Emergency Management Agency flood designations, shallow coastal flooding associated with high tides, or flooding associated with sea level rise or storm surge. Flood maps are then overlaid with any of three exposure maps to show how floodwaters might impact area assets. All maps can be saved, printed, and shared.
The societal exposure map provides information on population density, poverty, the elderly, employees, and projected population growth. Communities can use this information for community planning and to determine how floodwaters might affect vulnerable or concentrated populations.
Roads, bridges, water, and sewer systems can be damaged by coastal flooding. Communities can use the mapper to assess infrastructure vulnerabilities and associated environmental and economic issues to determine what steps are needed to protect these assets.
- The ecosystem exposure map provides data and information about natural areas and open spaces—including their proximity to development — to help communities identify which areas can be conserved for future flood protection benefits. Pollution sources are also identified to show where natural resources could be affected during a flood.
Coastal communities around the country are becoming more vulnerable to severe events and water inundation,” said Holly Bamford, Ph.D., acting assistant secretary of commerce for conservation and management. “According to the 2010 U.S. Census, the population of coastal communities is going to rise by 8 percent by 2020. Increased vulnerability plus increased population means communities are going to need accurate, reliable, and timely information to prepare for the future. Equipping our communities with information, products, services, and tools, like the Coastal Flood Exposure Mapper, allows them to become more resilient.”
This map tool was developed by the NOAA Office for Coastal Management.
NOAA’s mission is to understand and predict changes in the Earth's environment, from the depths of the ocean to the surface of the sun, and to conserve and manage our coastal and marine resources. Join us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and our other social media channels.
(TNS) — The woman won't look away from the dark huddle of uniforms standing behind a yellow police tape barrier that flaps back and forth in an occasional breeze. There, on the other side of this South Los Angeles parking lot, her brother is lying, still.
Two men in suits approach her. Their expressions signal bad news. Their words confirm it: Earlier in the night, her brother was shot in the head and killed.
Barbara de Lima, a grandmotherly figure with curly white hair, stands beside the family as they talk to the detectives. When a family member begins to cry, de Lima gives her a water bottle along with soothing words of comfort. The woman falls onto her, and de Lima cradles her head on her shoulder, calling her "honey."
For the city of Long Beach, Calif., the challenge of emergency management is clear: A small number of people are making too many 911 calls for medical assistance.
It’s a problem Long Beach and cities across the nation struggle with as a minority of callers and care facilities — also known as “911 super-users” — congest phone lines and stretch emergency resources. Financially, it's a problem for providers, governments and even the callers themselves. Yet more pressing is the impact on first responders, where a minute's delay could determine life or death.
To deal with the problem, Long Beach officials partnered with the civic tech group Code for America to create AddressIQ, a Web app that combines fire, police and business licensing data to reduce calls from 911 super-users. The tool connects addresses to both the number and type of emergency dispatches. The information enables emergency workers to collaborate on high-usage locations and assist callers through education, social outreach, or — in worst cases — enforcement measures.
It’s no surprise that the cloud is emerging as the dominant form of enterprise information technology as the decade unfolds, but exactly how this is playing out deserves a closer look.
According to IDC, the total revenues for cloud infrastructure – servers, storage and networking – topped $8 billion in the fourth quarter of 2014, a 14.4 percent gain over the same period a year ago and roughly 30 percent of the total IT spend. The growth was most pronounced in the private cloud segment, which exceeded 18.3 percent to hit $2.9 billion, compared to the public cloud which grew 12.3 percent to $5 billion. For the full year, total cloud spending grew 18.7 percent to $26.4 billion while private cloud came in at 20.7 percent growth to $10 billion and public cloud surged 17.5 percent to $16.4 billion.
What does all this mean? After a slow start, private cloud momentum is clearly on the upswing even as the bulk of cloud infrastructure remains in the public sphere. Going forward, I would expect continued spending on private infrastructure and then rapid uptake of hybrid solutions as the enterprise industry seeks to integrate its external resources with scale-out public platforms.
The Commerce Department’s first Chief Data Officer has worked with open data about as long as it’s been around — which isn’t actually that long, if you think about it. Ian Kalin’s resume shows he started working with open data in 2012 as a Presidential Innovation Fellow for the U.S. Department of Energy.
Since then, he briefly (2 months) worked as an Adecco contractor with Google, followed by not quite two years as the director of opened data at Socrata, which helps businesses leverage open data. Previously, he worked about five years with supply chain data. I’m sure his time as a Navy counter-terrorism officer and his numerous other acclaims didn’t hurt either. His background is a good fit for what the Commerce Department needs as it pushes forward with open data. He also has spent his career as a leader, so he’s fully qualified for that “chief” part.
Still, I admit I was surprised simply because of what’s missing: A strong IT background. Somehow I expected a CDO would have some traditional tech experience, such as a DBA or a programmer.
I was reminded today of him much the world has changed in my working life.
I am travelling in the USA and staying overnight at Monument Valley. The picture is taken from the porch of the cabin I am staying in.
I have no cell phone coverage, there is no TV in the cabin, but they do have WiFi and made sure they pointed out the password I would need to access.
Many aspects of life and society are changing. We need to be part of that wave of change – otherwise we get left behind.
That is why I am asking for your help. I need your help to complete a survey. The survey is seeking to understand “What Business Continuity might look like in 2020“.
In what is recognition of the high profile nature of the BCI Middle East Conference, His Excellency the Minister of Energy and Industry in Qatar – Dr Mohammed Bin Saleh Al-Sada – will open the conference and provide the welcome address.
Disruptive incidents can take many forms, whether it is a natural disaster or an IT failure, and it is essential that organizations have plans in place that make them able to respond to a disruption so that operations can continue. The growth of the Business Continuity Institute in the Middle East highlights that there is an increasing awareness in the region of the need for effective business continuity and the importance that the profession has in ensuring resiliency. His Excellency Dr Al-Sada's attendance at the BCI Middle East Conference demonstrates that this is a view also held at the highest level of government.
In confirming his intention to speak at the conference, H.E. Dr Al-Sada noted that: “The aim and objectives of the conference for providing a forum for sharing knowledge is timely and welcome to facilitate successful delivery of the goals incorporated in the Qatar National Vision 2030.”
H.E. Dr Al-Sada was appointed Minister of Energy and Industry 2011 having held the role of Minister of State for Energy & Industrial Affairs since 2007. In 2011 he was also named Managing Director and Chairman of the Board of Qatar Petroleum and has over 30 years of experience of service with the company having managed various corporate departments. He is also currently chairman at several companies including RasGas, Qatargas, Qatar Chemical Company, Qatar International Petroleum Marketing Company, Qatar Petroleum International and ASTAD Project Management, Industries Qatar, and Gulf International Services. He is also Vice-Chairman of the Board at Qatar Steel Company.
H.E. Dr Al-Sada is an active member of the Qatari community and has served as a member of several distinguished committees and organizations, including the Permanent Constitution Preparation Committee, and the National Committee for Human Rights. He is currently the Chairman of the Joint Advisory Board, Texas A & M University in Qatar, the Joint Overseas Board, College of the North Atlantic – Qatar, and a Member of the Board of Directors, Supreme Education Council.
A graduate from Qatar University with a Bachelor of Science degree in marine science and geology H.E. Dr Al-Sada also holds a PhD from the University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology.
The BCI Middle East Conference will take place at the Oryx Rotana in Doha, Qatar on the 11th and 12th May and the theme is sustaining value through business continuity. A packed programme is already in place consisting of local and international speakers who will discuss a wide range of topics and enable delegates to explore global challenges while considering regional solutions. For further information on the conference or to book your place, visit www.thebci.org.
NIST has announced the release of NIST SP 800-161, Supply Chain Risk Management Practices for Federal Information Systems and Organizations.
Federal agencies are concerned about the risks associated with information and communications technology (ICT) products and services that may contain potentially malicious functionality, are counterfeit, or are vulnerable due to poor manufacturing and development practices within the ICT supply chain.
Special Publication 800-161 provides guidance to federal agencies on identifying, assessing, and mitigating ICT supply chain risks at all levels of their organizations; as well as integrating ICT supply chain risk management (SCRM) into federal agency risk management activities by applying a multi-tiered, SCRM-specific approach, including guidance on assessing supply chain risk and applying mitigation activities. It also builds on existing practices from multiple disciplines and is intended to increase the ability of organizations to strategically manage ICT supply chain risks over the entire life cycle of systems, products, and services.
Read the document (PDF).
Cyber risk; the prolonging of the Ebola pandemic; and more regulatory and legislative changes are the top three priority risks for UK insurers in 2015, according to an ORIC International and Institute of Risk Management (IRM) joint survey.
The survey not only identified the top emerging risks but looked at both common and innovative emerging risk practices. It asked for the views of ORIC International members, who make up over 70 percent of the UK insurance market, as well as IRM insurance professional members.
Emerging risk was defined by those surveyed as newly developing risks with potential to cause significant business impact that may not yet be sufficiently understood.
A title of a column on the most important task of risk management is certain to get some mail. Here is what I think it is:
The most important task of risk management is providing insights and decision-making options to senior management and the board on a significant, pervasive risk or opportunity that they didn’t have previously, giving the organization a competitive advantage of acting timely before it’s too late.
While some may disagree with my point of view, I am confident most will agree that the potential for disruptive change in the marketplace makes the above task very important.
Theoretically MSPs have always been in a position to collect massive amounts of data that would enable them to add business value to the services they deliver. The problem is that the gap between that theory and the ability to actually deliver those insights has been nothing short of massive.
Now comes along HiveManager Next Generation, a cloud management service for wireless networks from Aerohive Networks that makes use of Hadoop to give MSPs access to a “data lake” that can be easily access primarily using REST application programming interfaces.
(TNS) — The measles outbreak that started in Disneyland and reached beyond U.S. borders, sparking a national debate on the merits of vaccinations, could be declared over Friday if no new cases are reported, state health officials said.
Since December, 134 confirmed measles cases have been reported by California residents. The latest was on March 2, according to the California Department of Public Health’s weekly update released last week.
Officials said 40 of those cases were confirmed to be Disneyland visitors and another 30 were people who came in close contact with a patient in their own home.
Nearly a dozen became infected in community areas like hospital emergency rooms. Experts don’t know where another 50 patients became infected but confirmed they were stricken with the same strain of the virus connected to the Disneyland outbreak.
One of the security industry reports most-cited in sales calls, vendor pitches and marketing collateral is at it again this year, with more ammunition for managed service providers selling security services. This year's Verizon Data Breach Investigation Report (DBIR) shows yet again how much opportunity there is in the MSP market for building out security practices and baking in added security value into general IT services.
An examination of statistics from real-world breaches investigated by Verizon's (VZ) forensics team, the DBIR most startlingly shows that in 60 percent of investigated incidents the attackers were able to compromise a target organization within minutes. Meanwhile, though many breach victims will publicly claim great sophistication in attacks involved with their particular breach, the truth is that the vast majority of the 80,000 incidents analyzed in the DBIR this year are attributable to just nine attack patterns.
Municipal open data has a new way to map itself.
Open data visualization startup Appallicious has announced plans to use its technology to map all varieties of open and internal data for cities.
The expanded features are part of a major refresh to the San Francisco company’s Disaster Assessment and Assistance Dashboard (DAAD) that maps local emergency and recovery resources in real-time. Through the dashboard, endorsed by FEMA, citizens can request assistance, first responders can update first aid locations, and local businesses can advertise recovery services – a significant boon to recuperating economies. Other features entail alerts, real-time incident reports, searchable and filtered resource management, and the ability to geo locate emergency tweets under specific hashtag categories.
Build? Buy? Host? It’s not a new debate for managed service providers (MSPs) and IT service providers. MSPmentor research has found most providers have opted out of running their own data centers, with the exception of very large service providers. What’s more, many MSPs say if they were starting over today they’d start as a born-in-the-cloud company.
For another perspective on this question, MSPmentor recently caught up with executives from Venyu, a company known for its data centers, but also a provider of cloud computing, managed hosting, and other services. And guess what? They pretty much agree with what we’ve found. Here’s what they told us.
(TNS) — As Mark McBride stood with tears in his eyes amid the rubble of Plaza Towers Elementary School, he vowed to do anything he could to protect the state’s schoolchildren.
With emergency workers everywhere, McBride, a legislator from Moore, knew that children were trapped inside the remains of the school — living or dead — after a direct hit from the massive tornado on May 20, 2013.
Within a day, he and colleague Jon Echols, a representative from Oklahoma City, had launched the nonpartisan Shelter Oklahoma Schools. Their non-partisan, multimillion-dollar effort aimed to help schools throughout the state bear the enormous cost of building storm shelters or safe rooms.
iPhone, Target, Home Depot; with each security breach we hear of, alarms are going off in the minds of business owners who have their data in the cloud or are considering working with an MSP. Cloud-based file sharing comes with a unique set of IT security challenges and it’s more important than ever for you to prepare a comprehensive strategy for protecting data and make sure your clients know you are addressing every issue.
Your clients are right to be concerned about their data security. The consequences of not employing an effective strategy for sensitive data management can be severe and may take businesses years to recover from. As their MSP, your job is to make sure business owners know if you acknowledge these issues while planning your cloud strategy, making the move to cloud sharing can greatly increase your data security.
Structured data is still king, but that may be in part because many organizations simply aren’t even trying to manage unstructured data, a just-released report by Dell reveals.
Dell commissioned Unisphere Research to query those who manage data at North American companies. The survey’s 300 respondents were primarily DBAs, with more than 60 percent coming from large organizations. The results are covered in “The Real World of the Database Administrator,” which Dell made available as a free download today.
Despite the press over Hadoop and unstructured data, DBAs say structured data is still the focus for most DBAs. More than two-thirds reported that structured data represented at least 75 percent of the data being managed. When it came to unstructured data, which can include everything from text such as email and social media content to machine logs, less than 12 percent said they believe the data’s growth rate exceeds 50 percent annually.
But that may be in part because many organizations simply aren’t keeping tabs on unstructured data. One-third of those surveyed said their organizations do not actively manage unstructured data or know how fast unstructured data is growing within their organizations.
The hype cycle is such a common facet of IT technology that it’s become almost a sport to predict where on the satisfaction chart a particular development finds itself at any given moment.
The cloud has been riding the hype for nearly a decade now, and during that time numerous pundits have proclaimed various levels of enthusiasm and disillusionment within the enterprise community. Lately, however, the talk has shifted from the cloud itself to certain categories within the cloud, each of which seem to be following their own hype cycles.
NTT Communications’ recent Cloud Reality Check holds that IT executives are expressing deeper frustration with the public cloud, saying their deployments so far are failing to live up to the promises made when SLAs were signed. According to Len Padilla, VP of product strategy at NTT, a big part of the problem is the idea that the cloud provides a better way to support legacy applications and data rather than cloud-native functions. Once data executives realize that issues like compliance, security and availability are best handled through local infrastructure, disappointment sets in.
As we brace for another season of tornadoes, hurricanes, forest fires, earthquakes and floods, all businesses should be asking, “Is our data protected should disaster strike?” Or more simply, “What happens if we lose our data?”
Sadly, despite the fact that significant portions of the country are at risk for severe weather and other natural disasters, not all businesses are thinking pragmatically about catastrophic data loss and downtime, which can lead to staggering financial losses and impact productivity, reputation, regulatory compliance, and ultimately the bottom line.
According to a global data protection study released in December, enterprises are losing as much as $1.7 trillion annually through data loss and unplanned downtime. Data loss is up 400% since 2012, and two-thirds of the 3,300 organizations surveyed had experienced data loss in the last 12 months. Researchers found that although a high percentage of organizations had disaster recovery plans in place, surprisingly few had implemented data protection practices and fewer than half employed remote, cloud-based data protection. Seventy-one percent of organizations were not fully confident in their ability to recover after a disruption.
Most companies have a plan for disaster recovery of IT, real estate, and data – but what happens when you must respond to allegations of a violation of customer trust or compliance? Does your organization know:
- What steps to take?
- Who needs to be involved in the decisions?
- When to notify the board?
- Who will conduct the investigation?
- How transparent you will be with shareholders? Employees? The media?
While the facts of the incident will vary, the need to respond quickly― and thoughtfully―is a given. To make that response effective, an organization must understand the key steps it needs to take after a serious compliance breach and the most important issues it must consider. Only then, can compliance officers and others charged with compliance responsibilities create an effective, executable plan for recovering from major ethics and compliance lapses, breaches, and disasters.
I.I.I. chief actuary Jim Lynch brings us some surprising numbers on America’s addiction to opioids:
Americans are grossly misinformed about the dangers of opioid drugs, according to a recent survey by the National Safety Council (NSC).
Opioids are commonly prescribed painkillers like Vicodin, OxyContin and Percocet. The drugs are meant to mimic the nervous system actions of heroin and morphine and all too often lead to similar levels of addiction and suffering. More than 170,000 Americans have died from opioid overdoses this century, nearly triple the number of U.S. military deaths in Vietnam (see my earlier post).
I wrote about the epidemic in Contingencies magazine, focusing on the toll the drugs have taken in the workers compensation system.
(TNS) — In the aftermath of last year’s lethal Oso landslide, the state Legislature has unanimously authorized an expanded state program to map slide-prone slopes and other geologic hazards. Equally important, the state would make that information more accessible to policymakers and the public.
But that laudable move won’t mean much unless lawmakers take the next step and pony up the money to pay for the program.
The funds would pay for increased risk identification and analysis using lidar, an aerial scanning technique that can reveal previously hidden geologic hazards. So far, it has been used to map less than a quarter of the state.
(TNS) — The Federal Emergency Management Agency has reimbursed Hawaii County more than $1.6 million in costs incurred while preparing for the lava threat from Kilauea Volcano, but county officials are still hoping for another $10 million — and counting.
Although the threat appears over, county officials believe their lava-related costs will tally at least $15 million, and they're hoping FEMA will continue to reimburse 75 percent of it.
Among the county's big-ticket items were three roads that were rebuilt at a total cost of $14.3 million to provide residents of the Lower Puna District with an escape route should lava cross Highway 130, the main road in and out.
FEMA already has paid $1.1 million of the county's $2.1 million cost to rebuild Railroad Avenue. The money went to the state, which will distribute it to the county.
With all the attention focused on California’s water woes, an observer might conclude that the Golden State’s drought is the exception. It isn’t. Forty states expect to see water shortages in at least some areas in the next decade, according to a government watchdog agency.
In a 2013 survey by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), state water managers from around the country said they expect freshwater shortages to continue into the next decade, even under what they described as “average” conditions. If those conditions change—whether because of rapid population growth, unusually low snowfall or rainfall, or accelerated economic growth—the situation could worsen.
“As far as other states, if they haven’t seen it in the past, it’s something they will see in the future,” said Ben Chou, a water policy analyst in the Los Angeles office of the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental group.
Five out of six companies with more than 2,500 employees were targeted in cyberattacks in 2014, representing a 40% increase last year, according to Symantec’s annual Internet Security Threat Report. But by no means does that imply big businesses are the primary target: 60% of all targeted attacks struck small- and medium-sized organizations.
The spear-fishing and fraudulent email scams deployed in these hacks have also become more effective. Overall, 14% less email was used to infiltrate an organization’s network, yet 2014 saw a 13% increase in attackers as the cause of a data breach, and the total number of breaches rose from 253 in 2013 to 312 in 2014. This notable increase in precision is a clear indication that companies are not updating their defenses to match current threats.
Fortifying against cyberbreach continues to demand even more concerted effort as malicious actors grow more sophisticated, introducing more and better malware to their campaigns. “While advanced targeted attacks may grab the headlines, non-targeted attacks still make up a majority of malware, which increased by 26% in 2014,” Symantec reported. More than 317 million new pieces of malware were created last year, meaning almost a million new threats were released daily.
(TNS) — If a hurricane were to prompt an evacuation in Georgia, Florida or South Carolina, emergency management officials want to make sure they are well acquainted with their colleagues in bordering states prior to starting the process.
“We want to make sure we are not exchanging business cards in the middle of a disaster,” said Clint Perkins, State Operations Center director for the Georgia Emergency Management Agency. “We want to reach out across state lines.”
He invited more than 50 emergency management personnel, state police officers and department of transportation officials from Florida, Georgia and South Carolina to the Golden Isles Career Academy on Tuesday and Wednesday for a two-day meeting to discuss state-to-state mutual aid in the event of an evacuation. It was the first such meeting since 2006 and a meeting Perkins said should happen more often.
Ian J. Kalin, the new chief data officer for the Commerce Department, certainly seems to understand that data is the new oil. That makes sense, given his roots at a small energy startup company and his work with the U.S. Energy Data Initiative. Surely, if anyone can understand the value of data as fuel, it would be Kalin.
So when TechRepublic contributor Alex Howard asked him to compare an “infinitely replicable digital commodity” to a natural resource like oil, you’d expect nuance. His answer doesn’t disappoint:
A major hurricane or earthquake hitting a densely populated metropolitan area like Miami or Los Angeles will leave insurers facing losses that far exceed their estimated 100 year probable maximum loss (PML) due to highly concentrated property values, a new report suggests.
In its analysis, Karen Clark & Company (KCC) notes that the PMLs that the insurance industry has been using to manage risk and rating agencies and regulators have been using to monitor solvency can give a false sense of security.
For example, it says the 100 year hurricane making a direct hit on downtown Miami will cause over $250 billion insured losses today, twice the estimated 100 year PML.
(TNS) — A new analysis shows more than 100,000 people are at risk from a tsunami on the Northwest coast — but the outlook isn’t uniformly grim.
In many communities, residents should be able to make it to high ground in time simply by walking at a brisk pace.
Tsunami surges are expected to slam into some parts of the coast within 15 to 30 minutes of an earthquake on the Cascadia Subduction Zone, the offshore fault where two tectonic plates collide.
Published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the analysis takes the most comprehensive look yet at the threat along the 700-mile-long coast of Washington, Oregon and Northern California — and finds surprising variability.
The global data load is about to surge as Big Data and the Internet of Things threaten to turn every device on the planet into an information source. While it is easy to see the promise that such an environment can offer, is the enterprise turning a blind eye to some of the consequences?
The obvious one is the sheer load that we are contemplating and whether it is possible to build the infrastructure to support it. By some estimates, the global load is due to rise from today’s output of about 4 zettabytes per year to more than 44 zettabytes by 2020. That’s not the total amount of data under management, mind you, but the amount the world will generate in a single year. Compare this to the average annual growth of the data center market, currently estimated at about 11 percent per year, and it is clear trouble is brewing down the line.
The most immediate implication of the surging data load is where to store it all. As Seagate Technology’s Mark Whitby noted to Tech Radar recently, even the most optimistic estimates of storage capacity generation over the next few years would leave us about six ZB short by 2020, which is twice the data output of 2013. New technologies are showing promise in high-density storage – resistive random access memory (RRAM) and heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR), to name a few – but it is questionable whether they will be ready for production environments in time for the data deluge.
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) launched a new feature to its free app that will enable users to receive weather alerts from the National Weather Service for up to five locations across the nation. This new feature allows users to receive alerts on severe weather happening anywhere they select in the country, even if the phone is not located in the area, making it easy to follow severe weather that may be threatening family and friends.
“Emergency responders and disaster survivors are increasingly turning to mobile devices to prepare for, respond to and recover from disasters,” said Craig Fugate, FEMA administrator. “This new feature empowers individuals to assist and support family and friends before, during, and after a severe weather event.”
“Every minute counts when severe weather threatens and mobile apps are an essential way to immediately receive the life-saving warnings provided by NOAA’s National Weather Service,” said Kathryn Sullivan, Ph.D., NOAA administrator. “These alerts are another tool in our toolbox as we work to build a ‘Weather Ready Nation’ – a nation that’s ready, responsive, and resilient to extreme weather events.”
According to a recent survey by Pew Research, 40 percent of Americans have used their smartphone to look up government services or information. Additionally, a majority of smartphone owners use their devices to keep up to date with breaking news, and to be informed about what is happening in their community.
The new weather alert feature adds to the app’s existing features to help Americans through emergencies. In addition to this upgrade, the app also provides a customizable checklist of emergency supplies, maps of open shelters and Disaster Recovery Centers, and tips on how to survive natural and manmade disasters. The FEMA app also offers a “Disaster Reporter” feature, where users can upload and share photos of disaster damage.
Some other key features of the app include:
- Safety Tips: Tips on how to stay safe before, during, and after over 20 types of hazards, including floods, hurricanes, tornadoes and earthquakes
- Disaster Reporter: Users can upload and share photos of damage and recovery efforts
- Maps of Disaster Resources: Users can locate and receive driving directions to open shelters and disaster recovery centers
- Apply for Assistance: The app provides easy access to apply for federal disaster assistance
- Information in Spanish: The app defaults to Spanish-language content for smartphones that have Spanish set as their default language
The latest version of the FEMA app is available for free in the App Store for Apple devices and Google Play for Android devices. Users who already have the app downloaded on their device should download the latest update for the weather alerts feature to take effect. The new weather alerts feature in the FEMA app does not replace Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA) function available on many new smartphones. WEAs have a special tone and vibration and are sent for emergencies such as extreme weather, AMBER alerts, or Presidential Alerts.
To learn more about the FEMA app, visit: The FEMA App: Helping Your Family Weather the Storm.
FEMA's mission is to support our citizens and first responders to ensure that as a nation we work together to build, sustain and improve our capability to prepare for, protect against, respond to, recover from and mitigate all hazards.
The social media links provided are for reference only. FEMA does not endorse any non-government websites, companies or applications.
Agile practitioners are often proud — and justifiably so — that when people are seriously adhering to the principles and practices, they keep the focus on value. They usually do a better job on average, I would argue from both first-hand experience and a fair amount of research, than the adherents of Waterfall methods. That’s not the same as saying that there’s room for improvement.
Value is a slippery concept. What’s valuable to you isn’t necessarily valuable to me. That statement extends to user stories, in which the “so that…” clause differs, depending on the persona identified in the “As a…” section that precedes it. We’re supposed to write stories that have some value for that persona, no matter how minimal it might be, but we often don’t show significant value until we’ve finished all the stories organized into an epic, theme, sprint, or release. (The attraction of creating an expense report, for example, is significantly less until you can update it when needed, too.) We prioritize the backlog from highest to lowest value stories for a variety of reasons, such as ensuring that if we run out of time before a planned release, we cut the lowest-value stories, which are coming conveniently last in the list. However, we know that life isn’t as simple as a single queue of neatly sequenced work items. Which is more valuable, the ability of a salesperson on the road to enter sales activity easily, or the report that tells the sales manager about the current state of the pipeline?
The strategic markets of Philippines, China, Japan and Bangladesh are home to over half of the 100 cities most exposed to natural hazards, highlighting the potential risks to foreign business, supply chains and economic output in Asia from extreme weather events and seismic disasters, according to new research from global risk analytics company, Verisk Maplecroft.
The 5th annual Natural Hazards Risk Atlas (NHRA) assesses the natural hazard exposure of over 1,300 cities, selected for their importance as significant economic and population centres in the coming decade. Of the 100 cities with the greatest exposure to natural hazards, 21 are located in the Philippines, 16 in China, 11 in Japan and 8 in Bangladesh. The analysis considers the combined risk posed by tropical storms and cyclones, floods, earthquakes, tsunamis, severe storms, extra-tropical cyclones, wildfires, storm surges, volcanoes and landslides.
According to Verisk Maplecroft, natural hazards constitute one of the most severe disrupters of business and supply chain continuity, and also threaten economic output and growth in some of the world’s key cities, especially for those located in the emerging markets. Although adverse weather dropped from 4th to 7th place in the Business Continuity Institute's latest Horizon Scan report, it is still considered to be a concern by over half (52%) of the business continuity professionals who responded to a survey. Meanwhile, earthquake/tsunami is considered a concern by nearly a quarter (22%).
“As typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines and the tsunami in Japan showed us, natural hazard events can have far-reaching and long-lasting impacts on supply chains, business and economies,” states Dr Richard Hewston, Principal Environmental Analyst at Verisk Maplecroft. “Understanding how, where and why those risks manifest is an imperative in managing potential shocks.”
Natural hazard risk is compounded in the Philippines by poor institutional and societal capacity to manage, respond and recover from natural hazards events. In addition to assessing exposure, the Natural Hazards Risk Atlas also evaluates a country’s ability to manage and mitigate the impacts of natural hazard events, through the Socio-economic Resilience Index. While Japan, which ranks 178th out 198 countries for resilience, is classified as ‘low risk,’ the Philippines (80th), is considered ‘high risk’, in part due to entrenched corruption and high levels of poverty.
“With foreign investment continuing to flow into countries highly exposed to natural hazards, those which are unable to demonstrate robust resilience may lose an element of their competitiveness,” adds Hewston. “Company decision-making over sourcing locations or market entry is increasingly influenced by issues such as strength of infrastructure and institutional robustness.”
What could be worse than stealing millions of personal records in a large data breach?
How about destructive cyberattacks against our vital infrastructure companies that run dams, power plants, transportation systems and other critical infrastructures around the globe?
Sadly, such cyberattacks are becoming much more common and causing more harm than previously reported.
A new, first-of-its-kind report was released just this week which reveals astonishing survey results from more than 500 security chiefs spread across 26 member countries in the Organization of American States (OAS). The official report was created in collaboration between OAS and Trend Micro, and you can get a copy of the full report at this website.
Here are some of the findings that I found very surprising – even somewhat shocking:
(TNS) — Add this to your smartphone’s many functions: In the near future it could help save lives by warning that a powerful, distant earthquake is about to shake the ground.
Earthquake scientists are proposing that “crowdsourcing” hundreds or even thousands of volunteers with their highly sensitive mobile phones could create a seismic early warning system to alert users of oncoming seismic shocks.
Seismologists in Menlo Park and UC Berkeley are testing the phones and foresee them as particularly useful in developing regions, like Southeast Asia and parts of Africa, that are prone to large and often devastating earthquakes but where more sophisticated warning systems don’t exist.
There is an old joke in sales that things would be great if it wasn’t for the customers. Of course, it is the customers that buy and that keep salespeople in a job. More generally, people accomplish tasks, do projects, have ideas and help to run businesses. Business continuity is inextricably bound up with people. They may be unpredictable as individuals, but display rather more predictable behaviour when grouped together. Predictive analytics has already been growing as a method of forecasting market conditions, economic trends and environmental developments. Increasingly, these techniques are also being applied in cases where people have a direct impact on business continuity.
In 2014, the Federal Bureau of Investigation sent a private notice to healthcare organizations regarding the industry’s preparedness to fight cyber intrusions. The notice stated healthcare organizations are “not as resilient to cyber intrusions compared to the financial and retail sectors, therefore the possibility of increased cyber intrusions is likely.” Until recently, privacy and information security has not been a significant focus of the healthcare industry. That is changing. In 2013, it was estimated that North American healthcare organizations were expected to spend $34.5 billion in 2014 on information technology. While there are numerous privacy and security risks in the healthcare space, two key areas for 2015 are enforcement by the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) through audits and investigations and the increase of bring-your-own-device workplaces.
Norway, Switzerland, Netherlands and Ireland are considered the countries most resilient to supply chain disruption according to the 2015 FM Global Resilience Index. Australia has dropped out of the top 10 this year, moving from 4th place in 2014 to 14th place this year, one place behind New Zealand. Venezuela, meanwhile, is rooted to the foot of the index, but Guyana and Bolivia both rose out of the bottom 10, owing to significant improvements in commitment to natural hazard risk management in the region.
The FM Global Resilience Index highlights the risks that come with operating in various countries and quantifies all the vulnerabilities these countries have in a definitive ranking of supply chain resilience around the world.
Supply chain disruption is a major cause for concern among business continuity professionals with the Business Continuity Institute’s latest Horizon Scan report revealing that it is the fifth in the list of potential threats to organizations compared to 16th place the year before. This is no surprise as three quarters (76%) of respondents to the BCI’s latest Supply Chain Resilience survey claimed they had experienced at least one supply chain disruption during the previous year.
Ireland keeps its place in the top 10, moving up one place to 4th in the rankings, reflecting both its low exposure to natural hazards and the fruits of its austerity and fiscal regimes. For the third year running, the United Kingdom has held on to its 20th place. Its ranking reflects its resistance to oil shocks as its consumption of oil relative to GDP is comparatively low. The UK scores well on other key drivers such as perceptions of its control of corruption and the quality of local suppliers, but there is scope for improvement in risk quality, particularly as it relates to fire risk management. In addition, the risk of terrorism continues to threaten supply chain security.
The United States and China are each segmented into three separate regions because the geographic spread of these countries produces significantly disparate exposures to natural hazards. Region 3 of the US, which includes most of the central part of the country, ranks 10th. Region 1, encompassing much of the East Coast, ranks 16th and Region 2, primarily the West Coast, ranks 21st. China’s three regions rank 63rd (Region 3), 64th (Region 1), and 69th (Region 2). Beyond natural disaster risk, China's other challenges range from poor accountability and transparency, high levels of perceived corruption and growing security concerns to problems in its financial sector, especially with regard to the fragile position of its banks.
“Business leaders who don’t evaluate countries and supply chain resilience can suffer long-term consequences,” said Bret Ahnell, executive vice president, operations, FM Global. “If your supply chain fails, it can be difficult or impossible to get your market share, revenue and reputation back. The FM Global Resilience Index is designed to help business leaders stay in business by making informed decisions about where to place and maintain global supplier facilities.”
The top 10 countries, those most resilient to supply chain disruption, according to the report were:
10. United States (central region)
The bottom 10 countries, those considered least resilient to supply chain disruption, were:
126. Dominican Republic
129. Kyrgyz Republic
The Index is compiled annually for FM Global by analytics and advisory firm Oxford Metrica. The Index is generated by combining three core factors of business resilience to supply chain disruption: economics, risk quality and qualities of the supply chain itself. The drivers of these factors include GDP per capita, political risk, vulnerability to oil shortages and price shocks, exposure to natural hazards, quality of natural hazard risk management, fire risk, control of corruption and the quality of infrastructure and local suppliers.
There are five laws of IT security.
1. There is no such thing as perfect security: Systems designed by humans are vulnerable to humans. Bugs exist. Mistakes are made. The things that make your computers useful--that is, communication, calculation and code execution--also make them exploitable. Information security is the management of risk. A good infosec design starts with a risk profile, and then matches solutions to the likely threat.
Nearly 37 percent of the United States and more than 98 percent of the state of California is in some form of drought, according to the latest U.S. Drought Monitor.
Its weekly update shows that more than 44 percent of California is now in a state of exceptional drought, with little relief in sight.
(TNS) — Henri might have to wait.
Colorado State University researchers are predicting a below average 2015 Atlantic hurricane season, with seven named storms, leaving Henri, the possible eighth named storm, out of the alphabetical running.
Of the seven storms, three are expected to become hurricanes and one is forecast to reach major hurricane strength with winds of 111 mph or more, researchers reported in their annual forecast released Thursday.
The report comes with a caution: "It just takes that one storm to make it an active season," said Phil Klotzbach, the lead author of the report put out by CSU's Tropical Meteorology Project since 1984.
It might surprise you to learn that the vast majority of Big Data analytics takes place within on-premises infrastructure.
This makes the most logical sense, in fact, because despite what you hear about the rise of the cloud, most Big Data loads reside in the enterprise data center in the form of both structured and unstructured historical data. To lower costs, organizations are placing their analytics capabilities as close to that data as possible.
But this is likely to change relatively quickly.
According to Wikibon, spending on Big Data hit $27.3 billion last year and is expected to top $35 billion in 2015, which is impressive for a phenomenon that didn’t even have a formal name until about three years ago. The cloud, however, holds only about $1.3 billion of the market, dwarfed even by the “professional services” (read, consultants) category, which draws about $10.4 billion.
The demands placed upon Business Continuity (BC), Risk Management (RM), and Disaster Recovery (DR) professionals are increasing every day. As a result, organizations need to reassess their approach Business Continuity Management (BCM). If they don’t, they’ll get left behind, affected by continued adherence to outdated methods. The convergence of the BC and RM disciplines are ongoing.
Emerging regulations, frameworks, and standards place greater emphasis on risk management. As decision makers accept this evolution, Business Continuity increasingly becomes a subset of Risk Management. How the process is implemented—the value it brings a risk-based model—determines whether or not the process is sound.
For months, federal law enforcement agencies and industry have been deadlocked on a highly contentious issue: Should tech companies be obliged to guarantee government access to encrypted data on smartphones and other digital devices, and is that even possible without compromising the security of law-abiding customers?
Recently, the head of the National Security Agency provided a rare hint of what some U.S. officials think might be a technical solution. Why not, suggested Adm. Michael S. Rogers, require technology companies to create a digital key that could open any smartphone or other locked device to obtain text messages or photos, but divide the key into pieces so that no one person or agency alone could decide to use it?
“I don’t want a back door,” Rogers, the director of the nation’s top electronic spy agency, said during a speech at Princeton University, using a tech industry term for covert measures to bypass device security. “I want a front door. And I want the front door to have multiple locks. Big locks.”
BATS Global Markets (BATS), a leading operator of exchanges and services for financial markets globally, has published details of a successful test of its business continuity processes.
As part of the test BATS took its company headquarters completely offline and operated from its Kansas City-area disaster recovery site instead. All of the 110 employees based at BATS’ global headquarters either reported to the DR site and conducted their daily routines from the secure and remote location or worked remotely. The BATS offices in the New York area, Chicago, London and Singapore continued normal operations.
In addition to the twice-yearly BCP test, BATS also tests its local Kansas City DR site each month. For one full day monthly since 2008, the company’s Operations, Technology, Regulatory and Surveillance teams in Kansas City have operated from the local DR site, with the primary headquarters remaining online.
BATS also maintains a DR site in Chicago that serves as a backup for its exchange technology infrastructure that is located in Secaucus, N.J.
Statement issued after the 5th meeting of the IHR Emergency Committee regarding the Ebola outbreak in West Africa.
The fifth meeting of the Emergency Committee convened by the WHO Director-General under the International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005 regarding the Ebola virus disease outbreak in West Africa was conducted with members and advisors of the Emergency Committee on Thursday, 9 April 2015.
The main issues considered were: ‘does the event continue to constitute a Public Health Emergency of International Concern’ and, if so, ‘should the current temporary recommendations be extended, revised, and/or new temporary recommendations issued.’
The Committee reviewed developments since the previous meeting on 20th January 2015, including the current epidemiological situation. The Committee noted that as a result of further improvements in EVD prevention and control activities across West Africa, including in the area of contact tracing, the overall risk of international spread appears to have further reduced since January with a decline in case incidence and geographic distribution in Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea. These three IHR States Parties provided updates and assessment of the Ebola outbreak, in terms of the epidemiological situation and the status and performance of exit screening and contact tracing.
The Committee recognized the progress achieved by all three countries and emphasized that there was no place for complacency, the primary goal remaining the interruption of transmission as rapidly as possible. The Committee reinforced the importance of community engagement in ‘getting to zero’. The Committee expressed its continued concern about the recent infection of health care workers and reaffirmed the importance of ensuring the rigourous application of appropriate infection prevention and control measures.
The Committee discussed the issue of probable sexual transmission of EVD, particularly the recent case who is likely to have been infected following sexual contact involving an Ebola survivor some months after his recovery. The Committee welcomed the ongoing programme of research underway in this area and urged its acceleration as a priority.
The Committee discussed the issue of inappropriate health measures that go beyond those in the temporary recommendations issued to date. The Committee was very concerned that additional health measures, such as quarantine of returning travellers, refusal of entry, cancellation of flights and border closures significantly interfere with international travel and transport and negatively impact both the response and recovery efforts. Although some countries are reported to have recently rescinded these additional health measures, and some regional airlines have resumed flights to affected countries, about 40 countries are still implementing additional measures and a number of airlines have not resumed flights to these countries.
The Committee concluded that the event continues to constitute a Public Health Emergency of International Concern and recommended that all previous temporary recommendations should be extended.
Source: World Health Organization
One of the more promising vertical markets for cloud adoption is healthcare. With the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) regulations being updated to incorporate the modern information technology landscape, the demand for managed service providers (MSPs) to help secure the industry’s data storage and cloud-based file sharing will continue to grow.
A recent story from FierceGovernmentIT cited Joe Klosky, senior technical advisor at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), who suggested that managing health data moving from system to system is “critical.” FierceGovernmentIT also reported the complex mission government officials are experiencing as “the rapid growth of health data is helping federal agencies better chart the quality of care being provided and other nationwide trends, but it’s also presenting some privacy and security challenges.”
Even in today’s wired world, many organizations require access to original documents to deliver goods or services. If yours is one of them, how you maintain continuity of access to those documents should be part of your Business Continuity Planning.
Even though we like to think we live in a paperless age, most of us don’t. In paper-intense industries, access to original documentation may have both financial and regulatory implications. In many other businesses, those ‘original documents’ are fleeting: checks, authorizations, forms and others that are acted upon then discarded. They are necessary only until converted or input.
Think of original documents as “paper data”. Even with documents of only temporary importance, their loss (or loss of access to them) may be vital to the performance of our most critical functions or processes. Why do we put emphasis on Recovery Point Objectives (RPO)? Because we understand losing electronic data may imperil our business. There is little difference with “paper data” waiting for conversion to electronic data. If it’s gone (because of physical destruction) or elusive (because we can’t get postal deliveries, or we’ve been forced out of our office) we can’t fully function.
Emergency preparedness exercise scheduled for the Three Mile Island Nuclear Power Plant
PHILADELPHIA – The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will evaluate a Biennial Radiological Emergency Preparedness Exercise at the Three Mile Island Nuclear Power Plant. The exercise will occur during the week of April 13, 2015 to assess the ability of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to respond to an emergency at the nuclear facility.
“These drills are held every other year to evaluate government’s ability to protect public health and safety,” said MaryAnn Tierney, Regional Administrator for FEMA Region III. “We will assess state and local emergency response capabilities within the 10-mile Emergency Planning Zone as well as the adjacent support jurisdictions within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.”
Within 90 days, FEMA will send its evaluation to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for use in licensing decisions. The final report will be available to the public approximately 120 days after the exercise.
FEMA will present preliminary findings of the exercise in a public meeting at 11:00 a.m. on Friday, April 17, 2015 at the Hilton Garden Inn, 3943 Tecport Drive, Harrisburg, PA. Scheduled speakers include representatives from FEMA, NRC, and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
At the public meeting, FEMA may request that questions or comments be submitted in writing for review and response. Written comments may also be submitted after the meeting by emailing FEMAR3NewsDesk@fema.dhs.gov or by mail to:
MaryAnn TierneyRegional AdministratorFEMA Region III615 Chestnut Street, 6th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19106
FEMA created the Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program to (1) ensure the health and safety of citizens living around commercial nuclear power plants would be adequately protected in the event of a nuclear power plant accident and (2) inform and educate the public about radiological emergency preparedness.
REP Program responsibilities cover only “offsite” activities, that is, state and local government emergency planning and preparedness activities that take place beyond the nuclear power plant boundaries. Onsite activities continue to be the responsibility of the NRC.
Additional information on FEMA’s REP Program is available online at FEMA.gov/Radiological-Emergency-Preparedness-Program.
FEMA’s mission is to support our citizens and first responders to ensure that as a nation we work together to build, sustain, and improve our capability to prepare for, protect against, respond to, recover from, and mitigate all hazards. FEMA Region III’s jurisdiction includes Delaware, the District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania and West Pennsylvania. Stay informed of FEMA’s activities online: videos and podcasts are available at fema.gov/medialibrary and youtube.com/fema. Follow us on Twitter at twitter.com/femaregion3.
A new survey out this week offers good evidence as to why so many businesses today bungle their response to security compromises and breach discoveries.
The study of 170 businesses conducted by the Security for Business Innovation Council (SBIC) and RSA, The Security Division of EMC (EMC), shows the majority of businesses lack incident response plans and have no capabilities to correlate security-related data from IT infrastructure, can't properly analyze live network forensic and have no way to take advantage of industry-wide threat intelligence.
"Organizations are struggling to gain visibility into operational risk across the business," said Dave Martin, chief trust officer for RSA. "While many organizations may feel they have a good handle on their security, it is still rarely tied in to a larger operational risk strategy, which limits their visibility into their actual risk profile."
(TNS) — A Belfast-based epidemiologist and family physician who investigated infectious disease outbreaks for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said Monday that public hysteria and paranoia are not the answer when such crises emerge.
A case in point was the recent furor over Ebola. Maine made international headlines when Kaci Hickox, a nurse who until recently lived in Fort Kent, was quarantined after returning from treating Ebola patients in West Africa despite having no symptoms of the disease.
As Dr. Peter Millard sees it, there is a better way.
“We’re going to have epidemics. Epidemics are always going to be with us. We’re going to have a bad epidemic eventually and if we don’t pull together and use science as a basis for our response, we’re going to be in big trouble,” Millard said Monday evening during a lecture in Husson University’s Kominsky Auditorium.
(TNS) — Mine rescue entered the 21st century Wednesday with the successful test of a suite of technologies that will keep rescue teams in constant communication with the emergency command center, state and federal officials said.
“We think we're ready to rock and roll with the systems we've built,” said Joe Main, the assistant labor secretary in charge of the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration.
The MSHA, the Department of Environmental Protection, Consol Energy and the Homer City-based Special Medical Response Team ran a simulated emergency at Consol's Harvey Mine in West Finley to test the system.
Has an entire year actually passed since the Heartbleed vulnerability was discovered? It seems like only yesterday that my social media news feeds were in pure panic mode. Chicken Little, the sky is falling! Or, in this case, the Internet is broken and our privacy is gone and everything we ever posted is going to be stolen!
The mass hysteria was unlike anything I’ve witnessed before or since in regards to IT security, and I’d be willing to bet if I asked 10 people about Heartbleed today, at least eight of them would have no memory of it. They’ve moved along to the next crisis, real or imagined.
So Heartbleed might be out of mind, but it isn’t out of our networks. And that’s the problem. A year later, 74 percent of Global 2000 companies are still vulnerable, according to a new study by Venafi. In August, a similar survey found that 76 percent of Global 2000 companies hadn’t fully addressed Heartbleed. I’m not a math whiz, but a 2 percent improvement over an eight-month period doesn’t sound positive. Plus, this just includes the 2,000 biggest companies in the world. I have my doubts that if large corporations are still struggling with Heartbleed, smaller companies are doing any better.
Are you and your family prepared to face a disaster? What about your neighborhood? Do you know your neighbors’ emergency plan or how you can help each other during an emergency? April kicks-off America’s PrepareAthon!—a nationwide campaign to increase emergency preparedness and community resilience. Throughout the month local, state, and federal groups will take the pledge to help improve their preparedness. All of these activities will lead up to PrepareAthon’s national day of action on April 30, 2015.
So what can you do?
You don’t have to be an expert in emergency preparedness, or the leader of a large community group to take part in America’s PrepareAthon! Learn more about what you can do in your neighborhood or community to become more personally prepared and help build your community’s resilience.
In your Neighborhood.
Youth volunteers performing an emergency response exercise.
If you haven’t taken the time to talk to your neighbors about emergency preparedness, or even just met them, take the PrepareAthon! pledge and make a plan to include your neighbors in your emergency planning. Often the first people on scene after a disaster are not first responders (EMS, police, firefighter, etc.), but rather the people who are closest to where the emergency took place. When a disaster occurs in your community you will most likely have to rely on those around you, especially if the scale of the disaster makes it hard for first responder to get to the scene.
Do not wait for a disaster to occur to meet your neighbors or learn about your community’s preparedness plans. Reach out to people in your neighborhood and discuss their emergency plans. If you have any medical or physical needs, such as limited mobility or dependence on medication or medical devices, talk to your neighbors about the assistance you may need in a disaster. Likewise, find out about the unique needs of those who live around you. Reach out to elderly neighbors and offer your assistance from shoveling snow to checking on them during a heat wave. No matter what the disaster or emergency, forming relationships with those around you can help improve resilience after a disaster occurs.
In your Community.
Beyond your neighborhood, getting involved in community preparedness groups and emergency response exercises can help improve your own personal preparedness and also your community’s ability to respond to emergencies and natural disasters. Strong community resilience requires people to come together and participate in planning and training before a disaster occurs. A good place to start when looking to become more involved in your community’s preparedness is with groups focused on emergency preparedness, such as your local Community Emergency Response Team (CERT), Medical Reserve Corps, or American Red Cross chapter. You may also consider getting a community group you are already involved in talking about emergency preparedness. Faith-based organizations, schools, or even your workplace are good places to start a conversation about emergency preparedness.
Take the Pledge.
Whether it is meeting your neighbors, joining a local emergency preparedness group, or starting an emergency preparedness initiative within one of your community organizations, make sure to register your efforts with America’s PrepareAthon! Help move your individual community and our entire nation closer to being prepared for any emergency or disaster that comes our way.
Planning Meetings: The Risk Management Plan
This new edition of "Risk Management: Concepts and Guidance" supplies a look at risk in light of current information, yet remains grounded in the history of risk practice. Taking a holistic approach, it examines risk as a blend of environmental, programmatic, and situational concerns. Supplying comprehensive coverage of risk management tools, practices, and protocols, the book presents powerful techniques that can enhance organizational risk identification, assessment, and management—all within the project and program environments.
Updated to reflect the Project Management Institute’s "A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), Fifth Edition," this edition is an ideal resource for those seeking Project Management Professional and Risk Management Professional certification.
With the expansion of large multinational corporations into developing countries such as Russia, Brazil, India, Mexico and China, a proliferation of global regulatory enforcement actions, including anti-bribery and anti-corruption, has risen. Recently, HP Russia paid more than $108 million in fines for Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) violations that occurred when its subsidiaries in three different countries, Russia, Poland and Mexico, made improper payments to government officials to obtain or retain lucrative public contracts.
Executives, including general counsel, compliance and risk officers, are smart to plan in advance for potential regulatory investigations. The disclosure, or production, of information that might be relevant to the allegations from the requesting regulatory bodies–part of the electronic discovery in the legal realm–is complex, costly and time-consuming in today’s world of information. It involves the identification, acquisition and review of information and communications from a myriad of sources, including day-to-day operations, financials, communications with foreign and government officials, employees and third party representatives, system data reporting, travel and entertainment expenditures, payment data, chat messaging, social media posts, and the like. All of this information is subject to scrutiny by legal counsel and the requesting regulatory body to determine whether there was any wrongdoing.
When some information is in one or more foreign languages, the document review process can become significantly more unwieldy and inefficient. Understanding and implementing best practices is critical for making the process easier.
(TNS) -- A downed power transmission line in southern Maryland caused a momentary loss of power that led to "widespread outages" in the nation's capital Tuesday afternoon, according to officials.
Previously, District of Columbia emergency management officials had said a reported explosion at a southern Maryland power plant may have been the cause.
A large number of outages were reported throughout the district about 1 p.m., including at the White House, Capitol and State Department headquarters.
According to Sean Kelly, a spokesman for Potomac Electric Power Co., just before 1 p.m., there was a momentary dip in voltage caused by a downed transmission line at a substation in southern Maryland, which is connected to a power plant there.
(TNS) — Gov. Mary Fallin expressed disappointment on Monday that federal assistance was denied to help individuals and businesses in Tulsa and Cleveland counties that were hit by March tornadoes. On April 1, the governor asked for a major disaster declaration for the state based on damages by tornadoes, straight-line winds and flooding March 25-26 in Cleveland and Tulsa counties.
Tornadoes resulted in four deaths with 26 people suffering injuries that required treatment at area hospitals, according to a state press release.
Damage assessments estimated that 1,047 homes and businesses were damaged in the tornadoes, severe storms, straight-line winds and flooding that occurred March 25.
When Datto acquired Backupify last year, we did so because we knew the technology landscape was shifting for MSPs. Data on-premise isn’t going away, but it isn’t the only place data exists. As more data is moved to the cloud, and to SaaS apps in particular, we realized that to build a Total Data Protection platform we needed expertise in SaaS data protection.
As a result of the acquisition, Datto now has more than 2 million Google Apps end users protected, and is scheduled to launch an Microsoft Office 365 backup at our partner conference in June. Building these products required us to get deeply embedded in both the Microsoft and Google ecosystems. We now know both companies well, know their key partners, and know the technical road maps of both organizations. So for those MSPs who may be considering whether to invest time in one of these products, here is our view from the trenches about the things you should consider.
For extended analysis of regional temperature and precipitation patterns,as well as extreme events, please see our full report that will be released on April 10th.
March was 12th warmest on record for the Contiguous United States
First quarter 2015: Record warmth in the West and cold in the Northeast, dire drought conditions in the West
The March contiguous U.S. average temperature was 45.4°F, 3.9°F above the 20th century average — the warmest March since 2012. Near-record warmth spanned the Great Plains to the West Coast and parts of the Southeast, while the Northeast was cooler than average. The March Lower 48 precipitation total was 2.08 inches, 0.43 inch below average, tying as the 19th driest March on record. Below-average precipitation was widespread across the northern tier states and the Southeast, with above-average precipitation in the Southern Plains and Ohio Valley.
This analysis of U.S. temperature and precipitation is based on data back to January 1895, resulting in 121 years of data.
- Fifteen states across the Southeast, Northern Plains, and West had a March temperature that was much above average, while five states in the Northeast had a March temperature that was much below average. No state was record warm or cold.
- Below-average precipitation was observed along both the East and West Coasts, connected by drier-than-average states across the northern tier. Twelve states had a March precipitation total that was much below average. Above-average precipitation accumulated from the Southern Plains into the Ohio Valley; Arkansas and Texas were both much wetter than average. No state was record dry or wet.
- According to the March 31st U.S. Drought Monitor report, 36.8 percent of the contiguous U.S. was in drought, up from 31.9 percent at the beginning of March. Drought conditions worsened across parts of the Central Rockies as well as the Central and Northern Plains and the Upper Midwest where spring drought could impact the upcoming growing season. Drought remained entrenched in the West, where mountain snowpack was record low for many locations in the Cascade and Sierra Nevada Mountains. Abnormally dry conditions developed in parts of the Southeast and Northeast. Drought improved in the Southern Plains and the Mid- to Lower-Mississippi River Valley.
U.S. climate highlights: Year-to-date (January-March)
- The year-to-date contiguous U.S. average temperature was 37.2°F, 2.0°F above the 20th century average, and the 24th warmest January-March on record. Record warmth engulfed much of the West, where seven states were record warm, and an additional five states, including Alaska, had temperatures that were much above average. California's year-to-date temperature of 53.0°F was 7.5°F above average and bested the previous record set just last year by 1.8°F.
- Below-average January-March temperatures were observed across the South, the Midwest, and Northeast where 16 states had a much cooler-than-average January-March period. New York and Vermont were both record cold for the year-to-date. The New York year-to-date temperature was 16.9°F, 6.8°F below average, dropping below the previous record of 17.4°F set in 1912. The Vermont January-March temperature was 13.3°F, 6.4°F below average, tying the same period in 1923.
- The year-to-date contiguous U.S. precipitation total was 5.66 inches, 1.30 inches below the 20th century average, and the seventh driest January-March on record. This was the driest first three months of a year since 1988. Below-average precipitation was observed across the West and much of the northern half of the nation. Twelve states had much below average precipitation during the first three months of 2015. South Dakota had its driest January-March on record with a precipitation total of 0.85 inch, 1.21 inches below average. Above-average precipitation was observed across the Southern Rockies and Plains.
- The U.S. Climate Extremes Index (USCEI) for the year-to-date was nine percent above average and the 11th highest value on record. The warm West and cold East temperature pattern during January-March contributed to the much above average USCEI, with the components that measure both warm and cold daytime and nighttime temperatures being much above average. The USCEI is an index that tracks extremes (falling in the upper or lower 10 percent of the record) in temperature, precipitation, and drought across the contiguous U.S.
Note: NOAA's National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) is the merger of the National Climatic Data Center, National Geophysical Data Center, and National Oceanographic Data Center as approved in the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015, Public Law 113-235. From the depths of the ocean to the surface of the sun and from million-year-old sediment records to near real-time satellite images, NCEI is the Nation's leading authority for environmental information and data. For more information go to http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/news/coming-soon-national-centers-environmental-information
For extended analysis of regional temperature and precipitation patterns, as well as extreme events, please see our full report that will be released on April 10th.
While I mostly talk to company, agency or organization leaders about crisis communication and reputation management, sometimes the reputation in question belongs to an individual. You don’t have to be a celebrity to have potential for reputation disaster. Individuals whose name is attached to the business or profession they are in, in other words where their name is also a brand, are particularly susceptible. Search engines and the long memory of the internet make the problem so much greater. Yesterday’s newspaper is already in the garbage and yesterday’s TV report is already in the ether along with all past reports, but on the Internet they are retained presumably for ever, and always accessible at the touch of a Google button.
A recent conversation reminded me of how the Internet has changed reputation management and how it therefore changes the response. The really big question when dealing with media coverage of bad news about a brand (personal, corporate or otherwise) is whether or not to respond, and if so, how far and wide to push the response. The basic rule is: don’t make it worse. You can make it worse by bringing the bad reports to the attention of others who might otherwise have missed the 11 pm news. Maybe it will all just go away. Or, not.
Your client calls in a panic. Something’s gone wrong with a server, and the Web store is down. You get there fast, run to the server and determine that it has suffered a hard drive failure. You collect your thoughts, think carefully about the procedure for restoring this piece of equipment quickly, but you draw a blank. The clock is ticking. Downtime is piling up, and your client’s face is reddening with anger because she’s not sure you know what you’re doing. You don’t tell her, but you’re not sure you know, either.
This is the last situation you want to find yourself in. As your client’s frustration mounts, her patience thins, her wallet empties, and her trust in you erodes. There’s only one thing that can stop this from happening, and it goes beyond having a backup and recovery plan. You need to make sure your plans work effectively, and you can only do this by testing them. Remember, you’re not just testing a backup, you’re testing your own ability to recover so you don’t end up testing your client’s patience.
In order to make backup and recovery testing effective, there are some questions you will want to ask yourself. The following should help you gather information you need to create a testing strategy that’s a regular part of your process. This way, when the time comes you’re not just “kind of sure” you can recover—you’re absolutely positive.
ERMS had a great quarter! With an increased demand we have been busy. Busy training new customers and helping them implement their new system. Just how busy? VERY! Our quarterly sales results were almost 50% above target.
Some of our newest customers include: Canadian Red Cross, Desjardin, Intact Insurance, Simon Fraser University, Worker’s Compensation Board of Manitoba (WCB), British Columbia Emergency Management (EMBC), the City of Cambridge, Canadian Federal Government (Shared Services), Independence Bank, Jewish General Hospital, and many more.
Why the increased demand? We believe it’s because more and more organization are starting to understand the value and benefits of emergency and crisis mass communication solutions. Our new, and existing customers, benefit in many ways when they implement an emergency mass notification system (EMNS). Some of those benefits include:
Risk is part of nearly every aspect of business. The daily practices for nearly every employee involve some mitigation of certain risks to keep the business moving forward.
Within many enterprises, risk management involves a person or team of individuals who attempt to consider future scenarios and extract possible business risks from them in order to identify areas of liability and possibilities for improvement and success—this is especially important in the area of project management.
In the latest edition of the book, “Risk Management: Concepts and Guidance,” author Carl Pritchard, a certified expert in the project management field, identifies systems that project management professionals (PMPs) can apply to manage risks within ongoing projects. Pritchard then explains how to use these systems in the daily work of project management in accordance with the most recent Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK).
DENTON, Texas – People living in parts of Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma and Texas are urged to get ready now for potential severe weather that could strike over the next few days in the form of possible severe thunderstorms, hail, strong winds, flash flooding, tornadoes and wildfires.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) Region 6 office continues to monitor the situation and stands ready to support state and local partners as needed and requested in any affected areas.
“We encourage people to keep listening to their local and state officials for updated instructions and information. The safety of people is the first priority,” said FEMA Region 6 Administrator Tony Robinson. “We encourage people to have an individual or family emergency plan in place, practice that plan and put together an emergency kit.”
If you have severe weather in your area, you will likely want to become familiar with the terms used to identify a severe weather hazard including:
- Watch: Meteorologists are monitoring an area or region for the formation of a specific type of threat (e.g. flooding, severe thunderstorms, or tornadoes); and
- Warning: Specific life and property threatening conditions are occurring and imminent. Take appropriate safety precautions.
Like virtualization, it seems that containers are going to work their way into the enterprise by stealth – that is, whether the people in charge of technology and infrastructure want them or not.
Part of this is due to the advent of the cloud. The more the enterprise offloads data and applications to third-party infrastructure, the less it has to say about the make-up and configuration of that infrastructure. But part is due to the fact that, like virtualization, containers are making their way into leading data platforms where they will exert their influence through standard upgrade and refresh cycles.
A case in point is container management firm CoreOS’s decision to integrate Google’s Kubernetes cluster management system into its new Tectonic platform. According to ZDnet’s Steven J. Vaughn-Nichols, this will enable the enterprise to manage Linux containers within their data centers in scale-out cloud fashion and by extension foster compatibility with existing Google applications that are almost universally housed on containers managed by Kubernetes. As the enterprise gravitates toward private clouds, particularly Linux-based clouds, an integrated container stack will be crucial for the delivery of applications and microservices to a diverse workforce. Other Linux developers such as Mirantis and Mesosphere are also working to integrate Kubernetes into the platforms.
Venafi has published new research reevaluating the risk of attacks that exploit incomplete Heartbleed remediation in Global 2000 organizations.
Using Venafi TrustNet, a cloud-based certificate reputation service designed to protect enterprises from the growing threat of attacks that misuse cryptographic keys and digital certificates, Venafi Labs found that 84 percent of Forbes Global 2000 organizations’ external servers remain vulnerable to cyber attacks due to Heartbleed. This leaves these organizations open to reputational damage and widespread intellectual property loss.
When the Heartbleed vulnerability was discovered in April 2014, many organizations scrambled to patch the bug, but failed to take all of the necessary steps to fully remediate their servers and networks. But despite significant guidance from Gartner and other industry experts, the majority have failed to take the necessary steps to fully remediate their servers and networks.
“A year after Heartbleed revealed massive vulnerabilities in the foundation for global trust online, a major alarm needs to be sounded for this huge percentage of the world’s largest and most valuable businesses who are still exposed to attacks,” said Jeff Hudson, CEO, Venafi. “Given the danger that these vulnerabilities pose to their business, remediating risks and securing and protecting keys and certificates needs to be a top priority not only for the IT team alone, but for the CEO, BOD, and CISO.”
Download the Venafi Heartbleed +1 Year Analysis (PDF) at:
The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) has published two consultation reports aimed at further enhancing the ability of financial markets and intermediaries to manage risks, withstand catastrophic events, and swiftly resume their services in the event of disruption.
The consultation report ‘Mechanisms for Trading Venues to Effectively Manage Electronic Trading Risks and Plans for Business Continuity’ provides a comprehensive overview of the steps trading venues need to take to manage the risks associated with electronic trading and the ways they plan for and manage disruptions through business continuity plans. As technology continues to evolve, trading venues will need to continuously adapt to these changes.
The report provides recommendations to help regulators ensure that trading venues are able to manage effectively a broad range of evolving risks. It also proposes sound practices that should be considered by trading venues when developing and implementing risk mitigation mechanisms and business continuity plans aimed at safeguarding the integrity, resiliency and reliability of their critical systems.
IOSCO´s second consultation report, ‘Market Intermediary Business Continuity and Recovery Planning’, proposes standards and sound practices that regulators could consider as part of their oversight of the business continuity and recovery planning by market intermediaries. These sound practices may also prove useful to intermediaries who are developing and implementing business continuity plans.
The two consultation reports draw on the results of surveys of IOSCO members and stakeholders, and feedback from roundtables organized with industry participants.
A key objective of the reports is to address possible weaknesses or gaps in the business continuity plans and recovery strategies of trading venues and market intermediaries.
Comments should be submitted on or before Saturday 6th June 2015.
Read the documents:
- Mechanisms for Trading Venues to Effectively Manage Electronic Trading Risks and Plans for Business Continuity
- Market Intermediary Business Continuity and Recovery Planning
(TNS) — Critics call it “sharpening the pencil.”
Since the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant opened on a rocky stretch of California coast in 1985, researchers have discovered three nearby fault lines capable of stronger quakes than the one that struck Napa last year.
And yet the plant’s owner, Pacific Gas and Electric Co., insists that Diablo isn’t in greater danger than previously thought. If anything, it’s in less.
PG&E has, at several times in Diablo’s complicated history, changed the way the company assesses the amount of shaking nearby faults can produce, as well as the plant’s ability to survive big quakes.
World Backup Day 2015 gave managed services providers (MSPs) a great opportunity to educate their customers about the importance of backing up personal data.
And even though this year's event has come and gone, MSPs don't have to wait until 2016 to teach customers about the value of data protection.
For example, a new survey from data backup and disaster recovery (BDR) solutions provider Kroll Ontrack revealed 61 percent of data recovery customers had a backup solution in place at the time of data loss.
The role of the IT manager ain’t what it used to be. There was a time when responsibilities primarily included building a software stack, managing the company’s infrastructure, and operating company-owned equipment. With the rapid adoption of cloud technology, including cloud-based file sharing, those roles and responsibilities have changed dramatically – and it’s critical for MSPs to understand this shift.
IT managers now fill more of a relationship manager role and are ideally viewed as partners by business leaders and department heads. MSPs looking to provide cloud services to clients need to understand this shift in roles in order to work – and be successful with – the new IT department.
Russ Banham from Forbes recently outlined some of the things IT pros are doing now instead of managing infrastructure. Here are a few things IT managers are doing now that MSPs should be prepared for:
The cloud has given business units within the enterprise a chance to do an end-run around IT when they need quick resources to complete a given task.
The CIO is rightly concerned about this, given the security and governance issues that such free-wheeling activity promotes. But in the front office, the end results of greater productivity and lower costs are hard to resist, particularly once the appropriate agreements are struck with cloud providers that enable broad protection and availability measures for data placed on third-party infrastructure.
It stands to reason, then, that many providers are positioning their services away from the technical elements of the enterprise and more toward the people who actually stand to benefit – the line-of-business managers who are under increasing pressure to get the job done no matter what. This is why we are seeing the rise of cloud services tailored toward key functions, such as marketing, as opposed to generic server and storage resources.
If your system has been hacked, what would your first reaction be?
Speaking for myself, I think I would want to know who did it and figure out how it was done. That’s my personality, to learn the who, what, and why of a situation first, and then focus on the damage control. I suspect that this is human nature for a lot of people, too.
On the other hand, when I asked that question to a security professional during an informal conversation, his response was this: Find out what information was hacked and determine whether the FBI needs to be involved immediately. You have to figure the data had already been compromised, he said, so you’ve got to work on minimizing the damage.
According to Edward J. McAndrew, assistant United States attorney and cybercrime coordinator with the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the District of Delaware, and Anthony DiBello, director of strategic partnerships for Guidance Software, the security professional I spoke with is on the right track. When a hack happens, it is important to resist human nature regarding the hacker (at least immediately). Instead, you want to focus on mitigating damage and data loss and providing information to law enforcement so the cops can identify and take action against the bad guys.
The data experts are still sounding the warning bell about data lakes, prognosticating a list of problems that data lakes will cause you.
Meanwhile, word on the street is that enterprises are building data lakes anyway, because everyone else thinks it’s a great idea. This means that many enterprises are now stuck looking for ways out of the prognosticated problems.
It’s going to get interesting for the rest of us—and possibly very expensive for some.
Gartner Director of Public Relations Christy Pettey revisited the problems of data lakes, drawing on Research Director Nick Heudecker’s presentation at the Business Intelligence & Analytics Summit. Pettey’s article identifies the three main problem areas with data lakes:
Concepts and fashions in business come and go. And sometimes they come back again with a new look or a different name. The origin of the DevOps name is simple to guess. It’s a combination of development and operations. The advantages cited of using a DevOps approach include a lower failure rate of software releases, a faster time to fix, and a faster time to recover if a new release crashes your server. DevOps is currently a buzzword in IT circles, but despite an inception date of 2008, just how new is it?
While many companies would like to adopt cloud services, many still resist over concerns about data security. Here's how managed service providers (MSPs) can overcome the two main objections to cloud computing and cloud-based file sharing in 2015.
As a recent article from CloudWedge says, “The most cited barrier to entry for cloud into the enterprise continues to be the security concerns involved with an infrastructure overhaul.” The problem with that lingering concern is that the enduring lack of education is hindering the market for MSPs. Yet, this knowledge also presents an opportunity.
What these hesitant or resistant organizations really fear is the unknown. And, what they don’t know is what adopting the cloud will mean for their most valuable, most highly-protected data.
(TNS) — So many earthquakes rumble through south-central Kansas these days that the Harper County Herald charts them in each week’s edition the way some papers run baseball box scores.
They run on page 12. Right next to the oil and gas industry news as a not-so-subtle reminder that there’s a likely connection between the quakes and an upswing in drilling operations.
“For a while there, every day, several times a day it was shaking,” said Herald editor-in-chief Kate Catlin.
(TNS) — Haunted by the public health community's failure to prevent or contain Ebola, a top Houston expert is spearheading a government-sponsored effort to prepare North Africa and the Middle East so that the region doesn't spawn the next infectious disease epidemic.
Dr. Peter Hotez, named a U.S. science envoy in December, fears the next virulent outbreak of a neglected tropical disease or emerging infection could strike ISIS-occupied territories in Syria, Iraq, Yemen or Libya, all of which fit the historical mold for such a disaster. He is working to identify institutions in the region that could send scientists to train in Houston, then ramp up back at home to produce vaccines in time to prevent an epidemic.
"We can't wait for catastrophic epidemics to happen and only then start making vaccines," said Hotez, an infectious disease specialist at Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital. "We need to start anticipating the next threat."
(TNS) — The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration is testing a new feature that lets people get a look at what kind of damage and storm surges are possible, and using Charleston, S.C., for the preliminary model.
The Experimental Storm Surge Simulator shows a street-level view of where water could rise in a storm surge.
"Surveys of the public show there is still a consistent misunderstanding of what the storm surge is, and how deadly it can be," reads the introduction to the app. "In part this is due to the challenge scientists encounter in trying to simplify the complex physics of hurricanes for the public, and in part this is due to poor misunderstanding of flood zone maps that represent the flooding scenario as it might be viewed from above."
Risk professionals aren’t prepared for the age of the customer. Empowered consumers and changing market dynamics are upending longstanding business models and lines of operation, but risk professionals largely stand pat, and continue to neglect risks related to their organizations’ most critical asset – company reputation. Yesterday we published a report on "Brand Resilience" that will hopefully help you change that legacy risk mentality.
New survey results suggest some communities are much better prepared for emergencies than others.
The Census Bureau and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development released data this week showing the extent to which Americans in different parts of the country have taken measures to prepare for natural disasters or other emergencies. Disaster preparedness questions were a new addition to the 2013 American Housing Survey, intended to assist policymakers and emergency responders with planning.
Nationwide, just over half of households had prepared an emergency evacuation kit. Only a third had communication plans in place, while 37 percent had established emergency meeting locations.
The April 2013 Boston bombing may have marked the first successful terrorist attack on U.S. soil since the September 11, 2001 tragedy, but terrorism on a global scale is increasing.
Yesterday’s attack by the Al-Shabaab terror group at a university in Kenya and a recent attack by gunmen targeting foreign tourists at the Bardo museum in Tunisia point to the persistent nature of the terrorist threat.
Groups connected with Al Qaeda and the Islamic State committed close to 200 attacks per year between 2007 and 2010, a number that grew by more than 200 percent, to about 600 attacks in 2013, according to the Global Terrorism Database at the University of Maryland.
Everyone knew the cloud was going to be big when the term first appeared in tech circles five or so years ago. But the speed at which it is taking over data infrastructure and the enthusiasm it has generated in the enterprise are surprising nonetheless.
As a rule, the enterprise does not alter the fundamentals of its data infrastructure lightly – even the transition from one core switch or centralized server or storage platform to another is a study in careful planning, particularly when a change in product lines or vendors is on the table. So when word came down that organizations could remove virtual architectures to entirely new resource sets that are not even controlled by the enterprise, there was every reason to think that maybe this would happen, someday.
But someday seems to be approaching at lightning speed if the latest research is to be believed. Goldman Sachs recently projected that spending on cloud computing and infrastructure will jump from today’s $16 billion – which is already a three-fold increase from the beginning of the decade – to more than $43 billion by 2018. And according to CenturyLink, 2020 will unfold with upwards of 70 percent of IT infrastructure residing in the cloud, nearly the opposite of what it is today. And reports coming in from the field indicate that most organizations expect to see improved service in the cloud compared to legacy infrastructure, as well as lower costs.
Last week we began the first workshop in our MSc Organisational Resilience from the module that has a specific focus on Security Management. We covered the usual discussions about crime theory and motivational influence before going on to discuss the scope and parameters of security. So far so routine: vanilla security management ideas. Then we began to move onto the more interesting and challenging elements of the workshop, where the contextualised approach was developed. Where does security management ‘fit’ with other resilience disciplines; and what does the critically evaluative approach that we undertake at postgrad level reveal about security’s true profile and organisational relevance?
It is context that is important and that is something that we can develop and analyse extremely well. How? Because our students and tutors are multi-disciplinary. If you undertake a security management course and staff it with criminologists; and all of your students are from a security, military or law enforcement background; you get bias. Bias is not something that we are too fond of as it tends to skew research and its outcomes. So with, for example, business continuity and emergency and crisis management specialists within our group, we have the opportunity to challenge the rigidity of thought that some see as the underlying trait of many security people. We have covered the theories of crime and we will not cover the processes of security (and its multiple sub activities) in any more detail from now on. However, we will look at the development of ideas, thoughts and research into security management in the organisation and its resilience; dismantling the behaviours and attitudinal approaches that restrict organisational capability from much wider viewpoints.
For years enterprises have attempted to move away from spreadsheets in favor of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, accounting systems and various other software systems and applications. Yet, no matter how hard organizations try, it seems spreadsheets will not go away.
Besides being easy to use and accessible, people are comfortable working with spreadsheets. When they have a job to do, spreadsheets are there—not waiting for IT. Yet when left unmanaged, the risks associated with spreadsheets can prove costly, resulting in bad business decisions, regulatory penalties, and even lawsuits. In some instances, unmanaged spreadsheets are costing organizations millions of dollars.
For example, last October a spreadsheet mistake cost Tibco shareholders $100 million during a sale to Vista Equity Partners. Goldman, Tibco’s adviser, used a spreadsheet that overstated the company’s share count in the deal. This error led to a miscalculation of Tibco’s equity value, a $100 million savings for Vista and a slightly lower payment to Tibco’s shareholders.
There are many products and services on the market today designed to help notify the right people with (hopefully) the right messages in the event of disruption of day-to-day operations.
Yet we in Business Continuity (and Emergency Management, Crisis Management and ITDR) spend little time, money or effort streamlining how we receive intelligence about events that could potentially disrupt our businesses. Why all the emphasis on outgoing information yet so little on incoming intelligence?
We already know what kind of intelligence we should be anticipating. After all, successful Business Continuity Management and Risk Management uncover knowledge of events that may negatively impact day-to-day operations. And there are many readily available sources which can alert us to those potential, impending or current events for both personal and business use.
If the title of this post makes you go cross-eyed, don’t worry. All will become clear. Let’s explain. Active/active IT configurations consist of computer servers that are connected in a network and that share a common database. The ‘active/active’ part refers to the capability to handle server failure. First, if one server fails, it does not affect the other servers. Second, users on a server that fails are then rapidly switched to another server that works. The database that the servers use is also replicated so that there is always one copy available. Now for the other two acronyms: HA stands for high availability; DR (of course) for disaster recovery. It is DR that is more affected in this case.
(TNS) — After nearly seven years without a large hurricane threatening the entire Gulf Coast from Texas to Florida, emergency planners say they're having a difficult time getting residents to prepare for the upcoming season.
"It's human nature," said Rick Knabb, director of the National Hurricane Center. When hurricanes don't happen, people forget about them.
This week the country's leading emergency managers and hurricane officials are meeting in Austin at the annual National Hurricane Conference, and this year the buzz has been about the recent lull in Gulf of Mexico activity and how that has made preparations for the season, which begins June 1, more difficult.
Recently, President Obama issued an executive order to address cyberspying and other maliciously intended cyber activities conducted by hackers and spies in foreign countries. The order will assess penalties for overseas cyberspying and those that knowingly benefit from the act. In an email message to me, Greg Foss, senior security researcher with LogRhythm, called it an “interesting move,” adding:
This is primarily because attribution within the information security space is not nearly as easy as it sounds. It is trivial for hackers to pivot through other countries and misplace blame in order to create the illusion that an attack originated from a specific location. Malware can and will be created that contains false data, to shift culpability.
As I’ve mentioned often in the past, the enterprise is not transitioning to the cloud, but many clouds. And with the advanced automation systems hitting the channel, it will soon be a relatively simple matter to deploy workloads to the appropriate cloud with little or no oversight from users or IT managers.
But how do you determine which cloud is the right cloud? And how exactly will all these clouds work together to produce at least the semblance of an integrated data environment?
According to EMC’s Peter Cutts, the either/or debate surrounding public and private clouds is over. Enterprises that have chosen both, in fact, are likely to see significant advantages over those who restrict themselves to pure-play infrastructure. The public cloud’s scalability cannot be denied, of course, but neither can the security, governance and performance of private infrastructure. In a hybrid scenario, the enterprise has the ultimate in flexibility when it comes to compiling the optimal resources for the business objective at hand.
Confusion surrounds the topic of how to bring some sense of order to Big Data. Depending on the day, the discussion might come down to data quality, data governance or master data management.
Here’s a hint: One of these is much less necessary than the others. You should always understand the quality of your data — big or otherwise. And it’s just basic legal smarts to create governance rules about data lest you fall afoul of regulatory compliance.
But when it comes to master data management and Big Data, you may be better off leaving each to its own. If you’re not clear on why, I recommend this post by veteran integration technologist Kumar Gauraw, who takes you through his thought process on why MDM and Hadoop don’t match.
On this day we celebrate the greatest upset in the history of the NCAA Basketball Tournament, when Villanova beat Georgetown for the 1985 national championship. Georgetown was the defending national champion and had beaten Villanova at each of their regular season meetings. In the final the Wildcats shot an amazing 79% from the field, hitting 22 of 28 shots plus 22 of 27 free throws. Wildcats forward Dwayne McCain, the leading scorer, had 17 points and 3 assists. The Wildcats’ 6’ 9” center Ed Pinckney outscored 7’ Hoyas’ center, Patrick Ewing, 16 points to 14 and 6 rebounds to 5 and was named MVP of the Final Four. It was one of the greatest basketball games I have ever seen and certainly one for the ages.
I thought about this game when I read an article in the most recent issue of Supply Chain Management Review by Jennifer Blackhurst, Pam Manhart and Emily Kohnke, entitled “The Five Key Components for SUPPLY CHAIN”. In their article the authors asked “what does it take to create meaningful innovation across supply chain partners?” Their findings were “Our researchers identify five components that are common to the most successful supply chain innovation partnerships.” The reason innovation in the Supply Chain is so important is that it is an area where companies cannot only affect costs but can move to gain a competitive advantage. To do so companies need to see their Supply Chain third parties as partners and not simply as entities to be squeezed for costs savings. By doing so, companies can use the Supply Chain in “not only new product development but also [in] process improvements”.
BSI has published a white paper that explores the role of metrics in the ISO 22301 business continuity standard and aims to help people understand the standard’s BCM measurement requirements.
The executive summary of the 'Measurement matters: the role of metrics in ISO 22301' white paper states that ISO 22301 recognizes the importance of having accurate performance information, laying down requirements for ‘monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation’. However, the emphasis on monitoring performance, measurement and metrics in ISO 22301 has caused confusion in some organizations. This whitepaper clarifies the requirements around measurement in ISO 22301. In addition three BSI clients describe how they have approached these requirements.
Read the white paper (PDF).
During the first quarter of 2015 Continuity Central conducted an online survey asking business continuity professionals about their expectations for the rest of 2015.
239 responses were received, with the majority (82.8 percent) being from large organizations (companies with more than 250 employees). The highest percentage of respondents were from the United States (35.6 percent), followed by the UK (24.7 percent). Significant numbers of responses were also received from Australia and New Zealand (6.7 percent), Canada (5.9 percent) and India (4 percent).
SEATTLE — The Ebola epidemic in West Africa has killed more than 10,000 people. If anything good can come from this continuing tragedy, it is that Ebola can awaken the world to a sobering fact: We are simply not prepared to deal with a global epidemic.
Of all the things that could kill more than 10 million people around the world in the coming years, by far the most likely is an epidemic. But it almost certainly won’t be Ebola. As awful as it is, Ebola spreads only through physical contact, and by the time patients can infect other people, they are already showing symptoms of the disease, which makes them relatively easy to identify.
We all know that we need to exercise our business continuity plans, it’s the only way to find out whether they will work. Of course that’s with the exception of a live incident, but during a disaster is never a good time to find out your plan doesn’t work. But what type of exercises should you run, how often should you run them, how to you plan them and how do you assess them?
These are all important questions and are all vital to ensuring that you have an effective business continuity programme in place, one that will provide reassurance to top management that, in the event of a crisis, the organization will be able to deal with it.
This is why the Business Continuity Institute has published a new guide that will assist those who have responsibility for business continuity to manage their exercise programme. ‘The BCI guide to… exercising your business continuity plan’ explains what the main types of exercises are and in what situation it would be appropriate to use them. It explains how to plan an exercise and what needs to be considered when doing so, from the setting of objectives to conducting a debrief and establishing whether those objectives have been met.
Following feedback from those working in the industry, testing and exercising was chosen as the theme for Business Continuity Awareness Week and the BCI is keen to highlight just how important it is to effective business continuity. A recent study showed that nearly half of respondents to a survey had not tested their plans over the previous year and half of those had no plans to do so over the next twelve months. This guide is intended to make it easier for people to develop an exercise programme and demonstrate that it does not have to be an onerous task to do so.
Have you ever experienced severe diarrhea or vomiting? If you have, it’s likely you had norovirus. If you haven’t, chances are you will sometime in your life. Norovirus is a very contagious virus that anyone can get from contaminated food or surfaces, or from an infected person. It is the most common cause of diarrhea and vomiting (also known as gastroenteritis) and is often referred to as food poisoning or stomach flu. In the United States, a person is likely to get norovirus about 5 times during their life.
Norovirus has always caused a considerable portion of gastroenteritis among all age groups. However, improved diagnostic testing and gains in the prevention of other gastroenteritis viruses, like rotavirus, are beginning to unmask the full impact of norovirus
For most people, norovirus causes diarrhea and vomiting which lasts a few days but, the symptoms can be serious for some people, especially young children and older adults. Each year in the United States, norovirus causes 19 to 21 million illnesses and contributes to 56,000 to 71,000 hospitalizations and 570 to 800 deaths.
While there is hope for a norovirus vaccine in the future, there are steps you can take now to prevent norovirus.
Additionally, norovirus is increasingly being recognized as a major cause of diarrheal disease around the globe, accounting for nearly 20% of all diarrheal cases. In developing countries, it is associated with approximately 50,000 to 100,000 child deaths every year. Because it is so infectious, hand washing and improvements in sanitation and hygiene can only go so far in preventing people from getting infected and sick with norovirus.
This is why efforts to develop a vaccine are so important and why in February 2015 the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, CDC Foundation, and CDC brought together norovirus experts from around the world to discuss how to make the norovirus vaccine a reality. Participants were from 17 countries on 6 continents and included representatives from academia, industry, government, and private charitable foundations.
Important questions remain regarding how humans develop immunity to norovirus, how long immunity lasts, and whether immunity to one norovirus strain protects against infection from other strains. There are also relevant questions as to how a norovirus vaccine would be used to prevent the most disease and protect those at highest risk for severe illness. These are all critical questions for a vaccine, and this meeting was a step toward finding answers to these questions and making a norovirus vaccine a reality.
For more information on norovirus visit CDC’s webpage: http://www.cdc.gov/norovirus/.
It seems like the breach cycle goes in full circles.
When data breaches began to make the news, the health care industry was hardest hit. Eventually, attacks against the health care industry, while they didn’t disappear, moved off the headlines in order to make room for breaches against the financial industry and retail and entertainment. But then came the Anthem breach, and now the announcement that Premera Blue Cross was hacked, with possibly millions of customers’ medical data exposed. I wouldn’t be surprised if we saw a flurry of news on health care-related attacks in the coming months, either.
The reasons are simple. First, health care organizations hold so much data that is valuable on the black market. You are looking at names, birthdates, addresses, Social Security numbers, insurance numbers, medical records and more.
Premera Blue Cross, a health insurer based in the Seattle suburbs, announced Tuesday it was the victim of a cyberattack that may have exposed the personal data of 11 million customers — including medical information.
The company said it discovered the attack on Jan. 29 but that hackers initially penetrated their security system May 5, 2014. The attack affected customers of Premera, which operates primarily in Washington, Premera's Alaskan branch as well as its affiliated brands Vivacity and Connexion Insurance Solutions, according to a Web site created by the company for customers. "Members of other Blue Cross Blue Shield plans who have sought treatment in Washington or Alaska may be affected," according to the site.
The company said its investigation has not determined if data was removed from their systems. But the information attackers had access to may have included names, street addresses, e-mail addresses, telephone numbers, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, member identification numbers, medical claims information and bank account information, according to the company's Web site. The company said it does not store credit card information.
Think you know it all when it comes to business continuity? That’s great. Think you can store all that knowledge? Think again. The way most information technology has developed, it’s great for storing information (bunches of related data), but not so hot for knowledge (insights and deeper relationships). There is no shortage of information to define business continuity, list its component parts, describe planning methodologies and offer case studies. You can access that information, transfer it and store it on your PC or mobile computing device. The problem is in storing your understanding of that material, and the model you develop to see them as a connected whole.
Zetta.net's "The State of Backup Survey" of 425 IT professionals revealed nearly 97 percent of respondents said they currently are using some form of disaster recovery (DR). Additionally, 31 percent said they plan to leverage a new DR method in the future, and more than half of these respondents intend to use cloud-based DR solutions. Here's everything you need to know about Zetta.net's new survey.
New research from Zetta.net showed that the demand for cloud-based backup and disaster recovery (BDR) solutions from managed service providers (MSPs) could increase soon.
Zetta.net's The State of Backup Survey of 425 IT professionals revealed nearly 97 percent of respondents said they currently are using some form of DR. Additionally, 31 percent said they plan to leverage a new DR method in the future, and more than half of these respondents intend to use cloud-based DR solutions.
No drought relief in sight for California, Nevada or Oregon this spring
According to NOAA’s Spring Outlook released today, rivers in western New York and eastern New England have the greatest risk of spring flooding in part because of heavy snowpack coupled with possible spring rain. Meanwhile, widespread drought conditions are expected to persist in California, Nevada, and Oregon this spring as the dry season begins.
“Periods of record warmth in the West and not enough precipitation during the rainy season cut short drought-relief in California this winter and prospects for above average temperatures this spring may make the situation worse,” said Jon Gottschalck, chief, Operational Prediction Branch, NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center.
NOAA’s Spring Outlook identifies areas at risk of spring flooding and expectations for temperature, precipitation and drought from April through June. The Spring Outlook provides emergency managers, water managers, state and local officials, and the public with valuable information so they will be prepared to take action to protect life and property.
Spring Outlook 2015. (Credit: NOAA)
Record snowfall and unusually cold temperatures in February through early March retained a significant snowpack across eastern New England and western New York raising flood concerns. Significant river ice across northern New York and northern New England increase the risk of flooding related to ice jams and ice jam breakups. Rivers in these areas are expected to exceed moderate flood levels this spring if there is quick warm up with heavy rainfall.
There is a 50 percent chance of exceeding moderate flood levels in small streams and rivers in the lower Missouri River basin in Missouri and eastern Kansas which typically experience minor to moderate flooding during the spring. This flood potential will be driven by rain and thunderstorms.
Moderate flooding has occurred in portions of the Ohio River basin, including the Tennessee and Cumberland rivers from melting snow and recent heavy rains. This has primed soils and streams for flooding to persist in Kentucky, southern Illinois, and southwest Indiana with the typical heavy spring rains seen in this area.
Minor river flooding is possible from the Gulf Coast through the Ohio River Valley and into the Southeast from Texas eastward and up the coast to Virginia. The upper Midwest eastward to Michigan has a low risk of flooding thanks to below normal snowfall this winter. Though, heavy rainfall at any time can lead to flooding, even in areas where overall risk is considered low.
El Niño finally arrived in February, but forecasters say it’s too weak and too late in the rainy season to provide much relief for California which will soon reach its fourth year in drought.
Drought is expected to persist in California, Nevada, and Oregon through June with the onset of the dry season in April. Drought is also forecast to develop in remaining areas of Oregon and western Washington. Drought is also likely to continue in parts of the southern Plains.
Forecasters say drought improvement or removal is favored for some areas in the Southwest, southern Rockies, southern Plains, and Gulf Coast while drought development is more likely in parts of the northern Plains, upper Mississippi Valley and western Great Lakes where recent dryness and an outlook of favored below average precipitation exist.
Current water supply forecasts and outlooks in the western U.S. range from near normal in the Pacific Northwest, northern Rockies, and Upper Colorado, to, much below normal in California, the southern Rockies, and portions of the Great Basin.
If the drought persists as predicted in the Far West, it will likely result in an active wildfire season, continued stress on crops due to low reservoir levels, and an expansion of water conservation measures. More information about drought can be found at www.drought.gov.
Above-average temperatures are favored this spring across the Far West, northern Rockies, and northern Plains eastward to include parts of the western Great Lakes, and for all of Alaska. Below normal temperatures are most likely this spring for Texas and nearby areas of New Mexico, Colorado, Kansas, and Oklahoma.
For precipitation, odds favor drier than average conditions for parts of the northern Plains, upper Mississippi Valley, western Great Lakes, and Pacific Northwest. Above average precipitation is most likely for parts of the Southwest, southern and central Rockies, Texas, Southeast, and east central Alaska. Hawaii is favored to be warmer than average with eastern areas most likely wetter than average this spring.
Now is the time to become weather-ready during NOAA’s Spring Weather Safety Campaign which runs from March to June and offers information on hazardous spring weather -- tornadoes, floods, thunderstorm winds, hail, lightning, heat, wildfires, and rip currents -- and tips on how to stay safe.
NOAA’s mission is to understand and predict changes in the Earth's environment, from the depths of the ocean to the surface of the sun, and to conserve and manage our coastal and marine resources. Join us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and our other social media channels.
In 2010, Google’s then-CEO Eric Schmidt gave a presentation at the annual Techonomy conference. He told attendees about Android’s incredibly phenomenal growth rate, but the real bombshell he shared was an interesting fact about data management.
From the beginning of human history--cave paintings until 2003--human beings created 2 exabytes of data. Total. That’s all the symphonies, all the movies, all the books--everything. Now we are replicating that every two days. That’s “Big Data.”
Even more staggering, about 80% of all the data we’ve ever created was generated in the past two years, and 90% of that is file, or unstructured, data. With data volumes expected to double every two years over the next decade, many IT leaders are feeling the pain of an infrastructure that isn’t scaling for capacity and performance.
DDoS attacks are now one of the most common and affordable cyberweapons. They are used by unscrupulous competitors, sinister extortionists or just everyday cyber-vandals. More and more companies, regardless of their size or business, are encountering this threat. And, according to the results of a survey conducted by Kaspersky Lab and B2B International, the majority of companies believe that revenue and reputation losses are the most damaging consequences of a DDoS attack.
According to the figures, companies regard lost business opportunities – the loss of contracts or on-going operations that generate guaranteed income – as the most frightening consequence of a DDoS attack. 26 percent of companies that encountered DDoS attacks regarded this as the biggest risk.
Reputational risks (23 percent) were viewed as the next most frightening consequence, likely to be since a negative customer or partner experience can drive away future contracts or sales. Losing current customers who could not access the anticipated service due to a DDoS attack was in third place: named by 19 percent of respondents. Technical issues were at the bottom of the pile: 17 percent of respondents identified a need to deploy back-up systems that would keep operations online as the most undesirable consequence, followed by the costs of fighting the attack and restoring services.
The research also revealed that respondents from companies in different fields take different views of the consequences of DDoS attacks. For example, industrial and telecoms companies, as well as e-commerce and utilities and energy organizations, tend to rate reputational risks ahead of lost business opportunities. In the construction and engineering sector there is more concern about the cost of setting up back-up systems, perhaps because larger companies face higher expenditure on this kind of system.
DDoS attacks on company resources are becoming a costly problem but only 37 percent of the organizations surveyed said they currently have measures in place to protect against them.
“People who have not yet faced a particular threat often tend to underestimate it while those who have already experienced it understand which consequences might be the most damaging for them. However, it makes little sense to wait until the worst happens before acting – this can cost companies a lot, and not only in financial terms. That is why it is important to evaluate all possible risks in advance and take appropriate measures to protect against DDoS attacks”, said Evgeny Vigovsky, Head of Kaspersky DDoS Protection, Kaspersky Lab.
If an organization’s backup system was designed before data volumes began to grow exponentially – or before IT infrastructures became highly virtualized – the company may find itself in a tight spot. Modernization is the key, and Logicalis US has identified six benefits CIOs can realize by updating their organization’s data storage and backup infrastructure.
"Working with an outdated backup system can create significant challenges in IT service levels,” says Bill Mansfield, solution architect, Logicalis US. “One sign it’s time to modernize your storage and backup/recovery infrastructure is when it’s too difficult to manage - you have to add staff to manage different backup products for physical and virtual servers, or you have to constantly fight fires to keep backups working. Another sign is when it’s just not working anymore. You can’t meet backup windows or recovery objectives because your backup techniques or storage are outdated, or your virtual environment’s performance degrades during routine backup operations. These are warning signs that you are working too hard to maintain an infrastructure that isn’t up to par, and that you could experience a significant loss if a disaster were to occur.”
ScaleArc has released the results of a new survey into 'The State of Application Uptime in Database Environments'. The 451 Research survey solicited responses from more than 200 enterprises of varying size, across a wide range of vertical markets, to learn more about the impact that an organization's underlying database infrastructure has on application availability.
Specifically, respondents were asked about their database infrastructure and its effect on both planned and unplanned downtime. The survey reveals key insights into the IT decision-making process, including the risks organizations are willing to take when choosing between application availability and security.
Commenting on the survey, Matt Aslett, research director at 451 Research said: "As enterprises struggle to improve application availability, understanding how the database affects application uptime is critical. The survey results indicate that enterprises cannot afford to maintain the status quo when it comes to database availability. Having your most critical applications be offline for 20 minutes to three hours, more than once a month, should not be acceptable to any enterprise today."
Key insights from the survey include:
- Database failover takes down the applications: for the majority of organizations, users see application errors for the duration of an unplanned outage. Failover is manual in most cases, and applications have to be restarted 62 percent of the time.
- Database outages are too frequent and too long: too frequently, the database is the source of unplanned downtime. A surprising 65 percent of all enterprises surveyed experience between 20 minutes and 3 hours of downtime, on average, for their most critical applications.
- Database maintenance crushes resources: more than 70 percent of respondents reported that they performed maintenance updates on a weekly or monthly basis. Those surveyed also indicated that key development resources are pulled in to assist with maintenance tasks 50 percent of the time.
- Deferred ‘security patching’ is rampant, placing enterprises at risk: more than 60 percent of respondents postponed critical security patches because of concerns over application downtime.
For the full survey report, please click here (registration required).
When it comes to damaging cyberattacks, a horror movie cliche may offer a valuable warning: the call is coming from inside the building.
According to PwC’s 2014 U.S. State of Cybercrime Survey, almost a third of respondents said insider crimes are more costly or damaging than those committed by external adversaries, yet overall, only 49% have implemented a plan to deal with internal threats. Development of a formal insider risk-management strategy seems overdue, as 28% of survey respondents detected insider incidents in the past year.
In the recent report “Managing Insider Threats,” PwC found the most common motives and impacts of insider cybercrimes are:
Despite some early difficulties configuring and deploying private clouds, the enterprise is still gung ho for them as a way to have a little piece of the cloud close to home for the most critical data.
But the knock on private clouds is undeniable: Unless you are willing to set up a vast array of modular infrastructure, private resources simply do not scale as well as public ones. And if a cloud can’t scale, is it really of much use?
To the first point, a private cloud may not offer “unlimited scalability” the way AWS does, but there are still plenty of ways that scalability can be architected into local resources to provide a decently large data environment. Infoblox is current working on private cloud scalability from the networking side, offering the new Cloud Network Automation stack for its NIOS 7.0 operating system. The idea is to provide a single management console for VMware, Microsoft, OpenStack and other platforms as they make the transition from pilot programs to full, multiplatform production environments. The system relies on an advanced GUI and a scalable virtual appliance architecture that handles the management of IP addresses and DNS/DHCP services, all backed by specialized adapters that enable consistent operation across multi-vendor platforms.
“Every company also needs to be a data company,” Leo Mirani, a reporter for the London-based Quartz, warned last fall.
I love that line, and once agreed. But in the past few months, I’ve had cause to rethink that premise and have decided that it’s not true for two reasons.
First, it ignores the ugly truth that not every company can be a data company. Everyone loves a success story, especially start-ups and vendors, so you don’t often hear about the failures. Companies that waste time and money trying to squeeze value from Big Data or other data projects don’t hire PR firms to put out press releases. But these stories exist, lurking in the subtext of data company success stories.
This GreenTechMedia story on utility data analytics is a good example. It’s a success story about start-up utility data analytics companies, but lurking among the unfathomably large market numbers and tech descriptions, our second story emerges:
The virus escaped control as countries and global agencies failed to acknowledge and contend with the magnitude of its spread. Treatment centers were overwhelmed. Sick people died on city streets, and new cases multiplied inside health care facilities, killing a significant proportion of the already inadequate health work force of the three most affected countries — Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea.
However, after two American aid workers and a traveler to Nigeria fell ill last summer, setting off a panic, a huge global initiative to combat Ebola swung into place. The effort has been messy, inefficient and expensive, often lagging the epidemic’s twists in tragic ways.
But the effort has also established expertise that may be built upon to prevent similar tragedies in the future — and shown personal and institutional bravery.
(TNS) — The man wasn’t any sicker at first than many of the other patients who arrive at University of Kansas Hospital, infectious disease specialist Dana Hawkinson recalls.
But he went downhill fast. Fever spiking, kidneys failing, breath so short he needed supplemental oxygen.
He had been bitten by ticks while working outdoors, so he probably had one of the many diseases commonly spread by bug bites in the Midwest, Hawkinson figured. But the tests the doctor ran — for ehrlichiosis, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, Lyme disease, West Nile virus — all turned up negative.
Even though the U.S. government has broadened its pursuit against corruption, only about 9% of organizations see Foreign Corrupt Practices Act monitoring as a top concern, according to “Bribery and Corruption: The Essential Guide to Managing the Risks” by ACL.
Many companies have policies against corruption, but it still exists. Although remaining competitive can be difficult in some parts of the world that see payments, gifts and consulting fees as part of doing business, companies need to identify these risks and manage them across the organization. There is much is at stake, as penalties are rising and more companies globally are being fined, the study found.
According to ACL, if a formalized ERM process exists within an organization, then the anti-bribery and anti-corruption (ABAC) risk assessment process should ideally be carried out within that ERM framework. In some organizations, however, the overall risk management process is fragmented, meaning that the risks of bribery and corruption are considered in relative isolation. Whichever approach is taken within an organization, the process of defining the risks should involve individuals with sufficient knowledge of the regulations and ways the business actually works.
Unstructured data received a boost from Big Data technologies such as Hadoop. Finally, organizations had an in-road to an estimated 70 to 80 percent of data that was largely unusable.
But Big Data isn’t the last work when it comes to leveraging unstructured data. A recent Baseline Magazine piece outlines the options for obtaining new business insights by combining structured data with unstructured data.
Blueocean Market Intelligence’s Senior VP of Analytics, Durjoy Patranabish, and Shreya Sharma, analytics consultant, collaborated to write the article. The consultancy focuses on solutions in marketing, life sciences, digital and, of course, Big Data. The resources section of Blueocean’s site is worth exploring in its own right since it includes quite a few papers, studies and webinars.
How often have you heard the expression ‘no pain, no gain’? These four words sum up the idea that if you are to receive benefits, then you must suffer (or at least make an effort). Alternatively, you could take it to mean that if you don’t make an effort, you can’t expect benefits. An example in the domain of disaster recovery might be ‘if you skip regular data backups (no effort), you’ll fail when your hard disk crashes (no benefit)’. The problem comes when people use chop logic to infer from ‘no pain, no gain’ that ‘if pain, then gain’ is true as well.
Fifteen or twenty years ago, when you thought about record retention and electronic communications, “electronic mail” or, email, was the only thing to worry about. Back then, firms and the regulators scrambled to interpret how to apply existing rules pertaining to communications to the new modality of email. Nowadays, email is just a one piece of a more complex communications landscape. Companies are deploying new forms of communication and the pace is only accelerating. Your firm might be using Unified Communications platforms like Microsoft Lync and IBM Sametime, collaboration tools like Chatter, IBM Connections, or Jive, or IM networks such as corporate Lync IM or perhaps public-facing such as Yahoo! Messenger. Your firm may even be using community networks geared towards specific industries such as Reuters and Bloomberg , widely used in the financial services sector, or ICE within the energy markets. And, of course, your regulated users, such as financial advisors, may also be clamoring to use social networking sites such as Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube, Google+, Pinterest, Instagram to prospect and conduct business.
A new report by the Business Continuity Institute, supported by certification body NQA, has shown that 6 out of 10 organizations adopt ISO 22301, the international standard for business continuity management. Organizations with strong top management commitment to standardising business continuity practice are four times more likely to adopt ISO 22301 than those who do not.
There are many reasons why an organization would want to embrace ISO 22301, most notably it provides assurance of continued service with 61% of respondents identifying this as a significant reason. By certifying to the Standard, organizations can provide reassurance to their stakeholders that, in the event of a crisis, it will still be able to function. Other reasons include:
- Reputation and brand management (48%)
- Reduced risk of business interruption (48%)
- Greater resilience against disruption (45%)
- Quicker recovery from interruption (44%)
There are of course barriers that prevent such commitment and those identified were resource constraints (25%), complexity of implementation (19%) and top management buy-in (18%). It is perhaps encouraging that these barriers each had relatively low percentages suggesting that the barriers aren’t that widespread.
If reassurance is one of the primary reasons to commit to the Standard then one can only wonder why many organizations don’t expect the same of their suppliers as supply chains can only be as strong as their weakest link. It could be considered alarming that 82% or respondents stated that their organization does not seek certification to the Standard from their suppliers.
Deborah Higgins MBCI, Head of Learning an Development at the Business Continuity Institute, commented: “It is encouraging that uptake is beginning to increase as organizations recognise the value investing in an effective business continuity programme, however there is still a lot of work to be done, most notably when it comes to persuading other organizations within the supply chain to also adopt ISO 22301.”
Kevan Parker, Head of NQA, stated “ISO 22301 provides an excellent framework for building organizational resilience and the benefits of adoption are becoming increasingly recognised. This is very positive but, as highlighted, a supply chain is only as strong as the weakest link; it is a responsibility of those with ISO 22301 certification to lead their peers towards adoption and elevate organizational resilience to total supply chain resilience.”
At the DRJ Spring World Conference in Orlando, FL on Tuesday 24th March, the Business Continuity Institute recognized the outstanding contribution made by a select group of individuals and organizations from across the continent as they presented their annual BCI North America Awards.
The BCI Awards consist of eight categories – seven of which are decided by a panel of judges with the winner of the final category (Industry Personality of the Year) being voted upon by BCI members from all over the United States and Canada. The number of nominations for each category was high, as was the standard of the nominations, leaving the judges with a difficult job to do in choosing the winners. But choose they must, and those who went home celebrating were:
Continuity and Resilience Consultant of the Year 2015
Roberta Atabaigi MBCI of KPMG
Continuity and Resilience Professional (Private) of the Year 2015
Cheryl Hirst of Erie Insurance Group
Continuity and Resilience Newcomer of the Year 2015
Garrett Hatfield of MetLife
Continuity and Resilience Team of the Year 2015
ETS Enterprise Resiliency Department Educational Testing Service
Continuity and Resilience Provider of the Year 2015
Continuity and Resilience Innovation of the Year 2015
Send Word Now
Most Effective Recovery of the Year 2015
Industry Personality of the Year 2015
Brian Zawada FBCI, Chairman of the US Chapter of the BCI; said: “Congratulations to all the winners who have shown themselves to be an asset to the profession. The high caliber of entries to these awards demonstrates the capability that exists within the business continuity and resilience industry, meaning that many C-Suite executives need not worry about whether their organization can manage a crisis, they can worry about other things instead.”
The BCI North America Awards are one of seven regional held by the BCI and which culminate in the annual Global Awards held in November during the Institute’s annual conference in London, England. All winners in the BCI North America Awards are automatically entered into the Global Awards.
Could the age of the virtual desktop finally have arrived? Rising demand for virtual desktops could create new opportunities for managed service providers (MSPs) over the next few years, according to a new survey from managed service provider Evolve IP.
Nearly 37 percent of organizations said they have implemented or tested some level of virtual desktops, while almost 33 percent noted that they plan on doing so in the next three years, according to the study, 2015 Evolve IP State Of The Desktop.
The survey also showed that nearly 98 percent of virtual desktop users are "very pleased" with the technology.
After a harsh, cold winter, the clear, sunny skies and rising temperatures of spring are much appreciated. Businesses, however, also need to be ready for the possibility of flooding that may result from heavy rains combined with melting ice and snow.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) notes that flooding causes more damage in the United States than any other weather-related event. On average, flooding causes $8 billion in damages and 89 fatalities annually. Warming weather also often brings ice jams along rivers, streams and creeks, which can cause further flooding.
“In addition to the threat of floods that occur when severe weather hits, snow and ice have been piling up in many areas of the U.S. this winter,” Bill Boyd, senior vice president with CNA Risk Control, said in a statement. “When temperatures rapidly increase, so does the rate at which snow and ice melt…” which can create serious problems for those heavily affected this winter. “As spring temperatures begin to rise, it’s imperative for businesses to create emergency plans for flooding, which could cause costly property damage or disrupt operations,” he said.
The results of the research show that few businesses have comprehensive workforce strategies, with the majority taking a piecemeal approach to planning human capital. Only 15% of organizations polled said there is a clear link between their workforce planning and their overall strategic business plan, showing that where workforce plans exist, they often do so in isolation.
Research conducted by the Business Continuity Institute has shown that workforce planning is also a concern for business continuity professionals with the results of a recent survey conducted for the the annual Horizon Scan report revealing that a third of respondents consider availability of talents/key skills to be a concern for organizations, while nearly two-thirds consider loss of key employee as an issue that organizations need to be aware of.
Organizations tend to react to workforce challenges, rather than plan for them. An alarming 47% of those surveyed by CRF said that recruitment forecasts for the next 12 months have not been undertaken in their organisations. This reluctance to identify workforce risks leads to poor succession planning, insufficient anticipation of recruitment needs and a lack of understanding of future skill requirements.
David Knight, Associate Partner at KPMG comments: “One of the biggest issues that business will face in the coming years is the management of human capital. Poor planning can make it difficult to adapt to changing market conditions, as well as retain talent in competitive industries. The ability to forecast skills requirements, pre-empt workforce risks and deploy resources efficiently will underpin financial success for organisations in future.”
Mike Haffenden, from Corporate Research Forum’s, comments: “In today‘s world of ever-increasing complexity, it is even more important to prepare for an uncertain future armed with a flexible plan, rather than simply reacting to unforeseen events. Adopting a strategic approach to workforce planning will leave organisations better prepared to deal with a dynamic and fast-changing environment.”
With 81% of large UK businesses and 60% of small companies suffering a cyber security breach in the last year, a new report published by the UK Government and Marsh entitled UK Cyber Security: The Role of Insurance in Managing and Mitigating the Risk has highlighted the exposure of firms to cyber attacks among their suppliers.
Cyber threats are estimated to cost the UK economy billions of pounds each year with the cost of cyber attacks nearly doubling between 2013 and 2014. The report found that, while larger firms have taken some action to make themselves more cyber-secure, they face an escalating threat as they become more reliant on online distribution channels and as attackers grow more sophisticated. The report issues a call to arms for insurers and insurance brokers to simplify and raise awareness of their cyber insurance offering and ensure that firms understand the extent of their coverage against cyber attack.
The cyber threat is also a very real for business continuity professionals with the Business Continuity Institute’s latest Horizon Scan report highlighting that cyber attacks are now perceived to be the number one threat to organizations. 82% of respondents to a survey expressed either concern or extreme concern at the prospect of this threat materialising.
The report recommends that organizations stop viewing cyber largely as an IT issue and focus on it as a key commercial risk affecting all parts of their operations, and that they examine the different forms of cyber attacks they face, to stress-test themselves against them and to put in place business-wide recovery plans.
The report also notes a significant gap in awareness around the use of insurance with around half of firms interviewed being unaware that insurance was available for cyber risk. Other surveys suggest that despite the growing concern among UK companies about the threat of cyber attacks, less than 10% of UK companies have cyber insurance protection even though 52% of CEOs believe that their companies have some form of coverage in place.
Francis Maude, Minister for the Cabinet Office and Paymaster General, said: “Insurance is not a substitute for good cyber security but is an important addition to a company’s overall risk management. Insurers can help guide and incentivise significant improvements in cyber security practice across industry by asking the right questions of their customers on how they handle cyber threats”.
Mark Weil, CEO of Marsh UK and Ireland, added: “While critical infrastructure in regulated sectors, such as banks and utility firms, are used to this kind of risk, most firms are not and their risk management practices are geared around lower-level, slower moving risks. Companies will need to upgrade their risk management substantially to cope with the growing threat of cyber attack, including introducing disciplines such as stress-testing, and creating a joined-up recovery plan that brings together financial, operational, and reputational responses.”
Geary W. Sikich introduces ‘risk absorption capacity’, ‘risk saturation point’, ‘risk deflection’ and ‘risk explosion’ and explains their usefulness to risk managers.
What is risk? Think about it before you leap to answer. Do we really know and understand risk? Some facts to consider:
- Risk is not static, it is fluid.
- Risk probes for weaknesses to exploit.
- Risk, therefore, can only be temporarily mitigated and never really eliminated.
- Over time risk mitigation degrades and loses effectiveness as risk mutates, creating new risk realities.
Risk management requires that you constantly monitor recognized risks and continue to scan for new risks. This process cannot be accomplished with a ‘one and done’ mindset. Risk needs to be looked at in three dimensions and perhaps even four dimensions to begin to understand the ‘touchpoints’; the aggregation of risk; and its potential to cascade, conflate and/or come to a confluence.
We often hear references to a holistic view of risk. “Holistic” is a term used in risk management to emphasize the importance of understanding the interrelationships among individual risks (or groups of related risks) and the coordinated approach that an organization’s operating units and functions undertake to manage risk. A holistic approach to risk management is, by definition, one that is not fragmented into functions and departments, but rather is organized with the intention of optimizing risk management performance.
A silo approach to managing risk is dangerous in today’s rapidly changing environment. Organizations can face change with greater confidence with an enterprise-wide perspective. That is why an enterprise risk management (ERM) approach is intended to be holistic in its perspective toward risk and how it is managed. While the goal of thinking holistically is laudable, the question arises as to what it means from a practical standpoint.
So things didn’t go as well as you planned; either your project implementation didn’t go the way you wanted – without any hiccups – or your organization didn’t respond the way you’d expected them to when the proverbial hit the fan. Well, get used to it. That’s the way things go. You always plan for the worst and hope for the best and having a project management background as well as my BCM/DR background, things don’t always go as planned no matter how hard you try. However, if something does go wrong, it’s a good idea to learn from it.
With most post-activities – either project implementations or responses to disasters and crises, there is usually one activity that’s always held; the Lessons Learned or Post Incident Review.
During these sessions, which I’m sure you’re familiar with, the focus always tends to be what went wrong and people trying to find the faults but most importantly, the person or area for where to lay the blame and shame them for their error. Well, to some degree that’s OK; you want to find the cause and find out what went wrong to cause the problem but it shouldn’t be to lay blame or just to focus on the negative. Often, these Lessons Learned meetings tend to be sessions where people can vent their frustration due to how inconvenienced they became as a result of the situation. Again, focusing on the negative. But that’s not all you should be addressing.
S&R pros, is there a Chief Data Officer (CDO) in your organization? Do you work with them? Previously, John and I wrote about the CDO role and how we believe that CDOs will help to drive security policy in the future because they can 1) directly tie business value to data assets, 2) have a deep understanding of data identity and purpose, and 3) possess a great incentive to protect the company’s data (it’s a strategic business asset after all!). Colleagues like Gene have also written about the CDO and the importance of the CDO in data management.
The sector continues to advance in its adoption of security services. As reported on MSPmentor, this is a rapidly expanding market, with continued opportunity for solution providers. With a fast-growing segment of the market being mid-sized businesses, this seems like a ripe opportunity to deliver services.
According to Gartner (and as quoted in the most recent CompTIA security report), the global security market was expected to reach $71.1 billion dollars by the end of 2014. So this is big business. Interestingly, based on analysis of data on successful attacks, many stats indicate that security should at least be a solvable problem for mid-sized businesses:
You’d think master data management would be an easy sell in a world where everyone wants an accurate “360-degree” view of the customer. And certainly, that’s a leading driver of adoption.
Yet it’s not always enough to make a winning business case, according to a recent Computing survey of IT decision makers.
The UK tech site interviewed 150 IT decision makers about MDM. The survey found that 38 percent were either currently scoping a project or implementing a project, while another 29 percent had already implemented MDM successfully.
The most-cited factors driving MDM were improving customer experience (60 percent) and improving the quality of strategic decision making. Despite these key business drivers for MDM, IT leaders still struggled to make the MDM business case. When asked about the primary challenges in obtaining funding for customer data management projects, the respondents said:
(TNS) — It's one of the few things that just about everyone seems to agree government should be doing.
But there's less consensus when it comes to figuring out how to pay the bill for making sure a call to 911 results in emergency responders rushing to help.
Pennsylvania's decades-old system for funding emergency call centers — a fee on monthly phone bills — hasn't been generating enough money to keep up with operating costs. And that's left local tax dollars plugging the gap.
This year, Berks County expects to put $2.53 million in county taxes and $2.97 million in fees it collects from municipal governments toward 911 center operations.
"This has become an enormous issue," said Christian Y. Leinbach, Berks County commissioners chairman.
Wi-Fi has serious security issues. As my colleague Carl Weinschenk wrote last year in a blog post discussing the vulnerability problems of Wi-Fi, particularly in the age of BYOD and working from anywhere, “… the world outside the firewall simply isn’t as secure as the world within.”
If we needed a reminder about the insecure world outside of the firewall, we got it last week with the news of a vulnerability discovered in hotel Wi-Fi. The flaw was discovered in ANTLabs InnGate devices, which provide in-room access for hotel guests, as well as the type of temporary Wi-Fi connections used in other public places such as convention centers. As explained by Wired:
The vulnerability, which was discovered by the security firm Cylance, gives attackers direct access to the root file system of the ANTlabs devices and would allow them to copy configuration and other files from the devices’ file system or, more significantly, write any other file to them, including ones that could be used to infect the computers of Wi-Fi users.
Amid all the time, attention and money devoted to upgrading and improving enterprise infrastructure, we should keep in mind that it is still just a means to an end. While the specifics may vary, that end is generally considered to be improved productivity, streamlined infrastructure and a more vibrant, dynamic user experience.
But none of this is going to happen without a complete renovation of data center infrastructure and, by extension, the mindset that governs not only design and architecture but human interaction with the digital ecosystem.
To Hiroshige Sugihara, president and CEO of Oracle Japan, this can be summed up in a single word, which unfortunately defies English translation. But generally speaking, it refers to the rejection of conceptual categorization that often prevents us from seeing the big picture – kind of like failing to see the forest through the trees. In the enterprise, this often leads to the one-to-one thinking that lumps together applications and hardware and ultimately produces the silo-based infrastructure that hampers interactivity and innovation. In the new century, the enterprise will need to base strategies on results, rather than what resources must be brought to bear on particular data sets.
The NCAA basketball tournament takes hundreds of good college teams from around the country and boils them down to 64 qualifiers, a round of 32, a Sweet Sixteen, an Elite Eight, Final Four and then two finalists who fight it out for the glory.
Similarly, we have whittled down the many flash storage tips from a multitude of sources into a handful. A couple of weeks back, we provided some tips focused on how to maximize flash performance. But so hot is the flash arena that we are now following it up with an Elite Eight among flash storage tips, these ones focused on product selection.
As the old adage goes, “Time is money,” and in the interest of saving money, we must not waste time. This is especially true when it comes to disaster preparedness and recovery—an area where many companies continue to fall short, as evidenced by the Disaster Recovery Preparedness Council’s 2014 Disaster Preparedness Benchmark Survey.
As part of the study--which surveyed companies of all sizes, from a broad range of industries across the globe--the Disaster Recovery Preparedness Council found that three out of four companies worldwide are at risk for failing to adequately prepare for disaster. Furthermore, the council found that incidents and costs of outages associated with disaster remain a major challenge for many organizations.
With the growing reliance on digital business processes in most companies today, the IT department has more responsibility than ever. But, according to new research, businesses are disrupted within the first few minutes of an IT outage and poor communications management means finding the right person to investigate the issue can take as long as, or longer than resolving it.
Forty-five percent of IT professionals reported that their business is impacted if IT is down just 15 minutes or less, and 17 percent said disruption occurs the instant an IT outage develops, according to research by Dimensional Research for a new report, the ‘Business Impact of IT Incident Communications: A Global Survey of IT Professionals.’ The report was commissioned by xMatters, inc.
Many CIOs are struggling to realise the full benefits of their increasingly virtualized IT estates, largely due to the strains of staying secure. But Reuven Harrison says it doesn’t have to be this way...
Over the past decade, businesses have been virtualizing ever more of their IT architecture. At first, CIOs were primarily attracted by the huge efficiency improvements and reduced need for capital expenditure. But as cloud computing has evolved and matured, firms are increasingly eying the main prize: the potential to attain unparalleled levels of business agility.
Being able to deploy resources such as servers, storage and connectivity on demand, and scale them up (and down) at will, has resulted in IT departments shifting more and more systems and applications over to private and (to a lesser extent) public clouds. And as firms move inexorably towards a fully software-defined environment – where systems are not only virtualized, but every part of them can be managed, monitored, configured, optimised and secured centrally and automatically – virtual nirvana seems tantalisingly close.
There isn’t a week that goes by without some headline news on a data security issue. Whether it’s data theft, operating system and browser vulnerabilities, or malware threats, today’s small to midsize businesses face dangers from every corner. Unfortunately, most SMBs don’t understand the impact these threats can have until it’s too late. Many also don’t realize it takes more than a simple anti-virus solution to get the job done. Yet SMBs don’t have the time or the expertise to install and manage the level of security software that is necessary to protect against modern security threats. How can managed service providers help?
The SMB market is highly dependent on managed service providers (MSPs) to deliver managed security services to protect corporate assets. It’s an opportunity that’s there for the taking, but to be successful MSPs need to take a multipronged approach--one that encompasses vulnerability assessment, Windows and third-party patch management, anti-malware, content control and filtering. Endpoint security, along with policy management and enforcement, is also an important part of the mix for maximizing SMB protection.
Business continuity is not just for businesses – public sector organizations and third sector organizations are perhaps just as likely to be affected by a disruptive event as any private sector organization. So are non-profits doing enough to protect the way they operate?
‘Business continuity challenges within the non-profit sector’ is the subject of the latest edition of the Business Continuity Institute's Working Paper Series. In this edition, Rina Bhakta CBCI discusses how there is a lack of shared knowledge on the way business continuity works in the non-profit sector. She argues that while there are various standards and benchmarking from other industries, it can be difficult to relate it to non-profits because a lot of it is not applicable.
Rina notes that the main challenge is that any programme adopted is usually based on best practice. Although the Charity Commission in the United Kingdom outlines the requirements of risk management, the section on business continuity is limited. It then becomes difficult in influencing appropriate buy-in and commitment when such aspects are not enforced by regulation.
In 'business continuity challenges within the non-profit sector', Rina talks through the six stages of the business continuity management lifecycle and provides case studies to highlight how each stage would apply to a non-profit organization. To read the full document, click here.
Businesses are more dependent on their supply chains than ever, with supply chain disruption one of the leading causes of business instability. To thrive, companies need to be resilient, and part of that is their location and the location of suppliers. According to FM Global’s 2015 FM Global Resilience Index, Norway tops the list of resilient countries, with Switzerland in second place.
The study’s purpose is to help companies evaluate and manage their supply chain risk by ranking 130 countries and regions in terms of their business resilience to supply chain disruption. Data is based on: economic strength, risk quality (mostly related to natural hazard exposure and risk management) and supply chain factors (including corruption, infrastructure and local supplier quality).
This is a tale from the mists of time; from days of yore when it was difficult to get people interested in business continuity management and even more difficult to secure their involvement in exercises and tests (OK, in fairness, that could have been this week, but just indulge me for a moment).
Some of you may have heard me tell this story before, but recounting ancient tales didn’t do Hans Christian Anderson (or my Dad) any harm and, in any case, I’m a big fan of recycling.
Having been asked to contribute something on exercising and testing to this year’s Business Continuity Awareness Week Flashblog, and despite conforming in terms of using the snappy title demanded of all the contributors, I really couldn’t bring myself to write about strategy or methodology or process or the difference between a test, exercise, rehearsal, etc, etc, etc. So I’ll leave that to those whose boats are floated by that sort of thing and tell you my favourite exercising story instead.
(TNS) — Many of those who lived through last August’s 6.0 magnitude South Napa Earthquake suffered mental health issues as a result, with about a quarter of those at risk for PTSD, according to a newly released survey, Napa County officials announced.
The California Department of Public Health recently released the final results of the door-to-door survey of Napa and American Canyon households conducted September 16-18. The Community Assessment for Public Health Emergency Response final report was based on the survey that asked questions about residents’ experiences during and after the temblor to assess the extent of injuries, chronic disease exacerbation and mental health issues associated with the earthquake, and the degree of disaster preparedness of these communities.
Mental health issues were extremely common among residents of both cities, with about 79 percent of Napa households and 73 percent of American Canyon households reporting a traumatic experience or mental health stressor during or since the earthquake.
WASHINGTON—The U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), in coordination with state and tribal emergency managers and state broadcasting associations, will conduct a test of the Emergency Alert System (EAS) on Wednesday, March 18, 2015 in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee. The test will begin at 2:30 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) and will last approximately one minute.
“The goal of the test is to assess the operational readiness and effectiveness of the EAS to deliver a national emergency test message to radio, television and cable providers who broadcast lifesaving alerts and emergency information to the public,” said Damon Penn, Assistant Administrator of FEMA’s National Continuity Programs. “The only way to demonstrate the resilience of the system’s infrastructure is through comprehensive testing to ensure that members of tribes, and the residents of Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee, receive alerts when an emergency occurs.”
The test will be seen and heard over radio and television in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee, similar to regular monthly testing of the EAS conducted by state officials and broadcasters. The test message will be nearly identical to the regular monthly tests of the EAS normally heard by public. Only the word “national” will be added to the test message: “This is a national test of the Emergency Alert System. This is only a test...”
The test is designed to have limited impact on the public, with only minor disruptions of radio and television programs that normally occur when broadcasters regularly test EAS in their area. Broadcasters and cable operators’ participation in the test is completely voluntary. There is no Federal Communications Commission regulatory liability for stations that choose not to participate.
In 2007, FEMA began modernizing the nation’s public alert and warning system by integrating new technologies into existing alert systems. The new system is known to broadcasters and local alerting officials as the Integrated Public Alert and Warning System or IPAWS. IPAWS connects public safety officials, such as emergency managers, police and fire departments, to multiple communications channels to send alerts to warn when a disaster happens. For more information, please visit www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/31814.
Panda Security accidentally flagged itself as malware last week, causing some user files to be quarantined.
What can managed service providers (MSPs) and their customers learn from these IT security newsmakers? Check out this week's list of IT security stories to watch to find out:
The growing proliferation of mobile devices continues to make business faster, more agile, and more efficient. However, a recent study suggests U.S. workers remain concerned about the security of their mobile devices when it comes to cloud-based file sharing.
According to a recent study, 73 percent of the 1,000 U.S. employees surveyed said that they preferred to use email over file-sharing services, up 4 percent from the 69 percent in the previous year's survey. Those who made use of file-sharing services dropped to 47 percent, down from 52 percent in 2013.
Keeping up with and fending off cybersecurity threats is a daily topic for all organizations, but for health care providers and systems, failure in that regard can result in much more dire results than a financial or reputational loss. It can result in bodily harm or death. It’s possible that you could draw a line to such severe consequences in other industries and lines of work, but for the health care industry, that added layer of urgency is always present in cybersecurity protections.
A large research project devoted to determining how best to protect patient health while maximizing use of digital tools and resources, named IMMUNE-SECURE, got a boost in attention from health care IT organizations and other technologists with the announcement today that Dr. Larry Ponemon, well-known in IT circles for his work through the Ponemon Institute, has joined the advisory board for the project.
How things change. For years, even decades, people have been getting rid of tape. They bought into the idea that disk was the way to go and that tape was “old hat.”
But the realities of a Big Data world and the advances in tape technology, density, reliability and usability have brought the realization to many that they shouldn’t have been so hasty. And that’s showing up in the raw numbers. According to the Active Archive Alliance, nearly 250 million Linear Tape Open (LTO) tape cartridges have been shipped since the format’s inception. That’s more than 100,000 PB of data on LTO.
Tape, then, is returning to some organizations that dumped it a while back. Its role is steadily being expanded in others who remained faithful, and it now serves as the backbone data repository for many of the major cloud data providers.
HOUSTON—The recent spike in oil and natural gas production has led trucking companies to grow so quickly that they sometimes scramble to find qualified drivers. This has meant tightening coverage with a limited number of carriers and a market in “disarray,” Anthony Dorn, a broker with Sloan Mason Insurance Services said today at the IRMI Energy Risk and Insurance Conference.
“Carriers have taken a bath on construction risks,” he said. “Only nine carriers will write crude hauling.”
He added that there is a “huge need for risk management in trucking right now. A lot of these are fly-by-night companies. They are running with drivers that have no experience, they are getting violations from the DOT left and right for not having licenses and adequate brakes on their trucks and they are running on dirt roads that aren’t made for 100,000 pound units,” Dorn said. “It’s a very risky place for underwriters. If we don’t do something as agents and as risk managers there will be fewer carriers.”
By Gabriel Gambill
You would be pretty worried if you didn’t have fire safety and evacuation plans in your office, so why would you not put the same contingency strategy in place for your data?
Too many businesses don't have a disaster recovery plan, so my advice is to sit down and consider it pronto. Disaster recovery as a service (DraaS) or cloud-based DR strategies are now making data recovery plans far less complicated and highly efficient for businesses. But despite being able to re-think their DR plans in the cloud and make them so much easier, companies are still lax about testing the plan on a regular basis.
To put it into context, perhaps it’s best to start by defining what a disaster could be. When we say ‘disaster’ often we mean something that is out of our hands. Floods, hurricanes power cuts and earthquakes all spring to mind. However a disaster could be something as mundane as a software update or a simple human error. They're often not as newsworthy as a natural disaster but have just as much impact on an organization’s ability to operate.